Showing 201 - 220 results of 103,304 for search '(( 5 ((((we decrease) OR (a decrease))) OR (mean decrease)) ) OR ( 2 step decrease ))', query time: 1.08s Refine Results
  1. 201
  2. 202

    Activation of mitoK<sub>ATP</sub> channels decreased the latency time of the transjunctional currents in slice. by Jiangping Wang (281901)

    Published 2013
    “…<p>(<b>A</b>) Currents in S<sub>cell</sub> induced by a pair of ±160 mV voltage steps and the transjunctional currents received by the R<sub>cell</sub>. …”
  3. 203
  4. 204

    Image_2_EEG 40 Hz Coherence Decreases in REM Sleep and Ketamine Model of Psychosis.TIF by Santiago Castro-Zaballa (6238823)

    Published 2019
    “…On the contrary, gamma power was relatively high under ketamine, and similar to QW and REM sleep. We conclude that functional interactions between cortical areas in the gamma frequency band decrease in both experimental models of psychosis. …”
  5. 205

    Image_1_EEG 40 Hz Coherence Decreases in REM Sleep and Ketamine Model of Psychosis.TIF by Santiago Castro-Zaballa (6238823)

    Published 2019
    “…On the contrary, gamma power was relatively high under ketamine, and similar to QW and REM sleep. We conclude that functional interactions between cortical areas in the gamma frequency band decrease in both experimental models of psychosis. …”
  6. 206

    Algorithm operation steps. by Junyan Wang (4738518)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental results demonstrate that SCI-YOLO11 achieves a 3.2% improvement over baseline models in terms of MAP@0.5 metric; precision and recall rates increase by 2.6% and 3.7%, respectively. …”
  7. 207
  8. 208
  9. 209
  10. 210

    Increases in 1,5-anhydrosorbitol and decreases in ascorbic acid following RYGB. by David M. Mutch (37665)

    Published 2013
    “…B) For ascorbic acid, the ANOVA model did not detect group-specific changes over time (no group:time interaction), but indicated significant decreases from T0 to T6 in both groups. Overall, 1,5-anhydrosorbitol and ascorbic acid were significantly different at each time point between OB and OB/D subgroups (p<0.01, see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0007905#pone-0007905-t002" target="_blank"><b>TABLE 2</b></a>).…”
  11. 211
  12. 212
  13. 213
  14. 214
  15. 215
  16. 216
  17. 217
  18. 218
  19. 219
  20. 220