Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
5 point » _ point (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
5 point » _ point (Expand Search)
-
41
-
42
-
43
-
44
Eltrombopag markedly decreases levels of ROS in MOLM14 cells.
Published 2015“…B) Graphic presentation of ROS levels measured by flow cytometry in cells treated with E (5 μM) or DPI (25 μM), an inhibitor of NADPH oxidase known to decrease an intracellular level of ROS, or untreated (CTR) cells. …”
-
45
-
46
-
47
-
48
-
49
FUD transiently decreased IOP in mice injected with Ad5-TGFβ2 viral vector.
Published 2020“…No trt = contralateral eye that was uninjected. All graphs show mean ± SEM of IOPs at that time point. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired Student t-test.…”
-
50
-
51
-
52
-
53
Multivariable Linear Regression Model of the Residents P-V Fit score<sup>a</sup>.
Published 2025Subjects: -
54
-
55
-
56
PowerPoint Slides for: Patiromer Decreases Serum Potassium and Phosphate Levels in Patients on Hemodialysis
Published 2016“…On patiromer, P decreased from 7.0 ± 0.5 to 6.2 ± 0.5 mg/dl (p = 0.04). …”
-
57
Flow diagram of the study.
Published 2023“…A total of 162 patients were included. The SOFA score on POD 5 was significantly higher in the High-decrease group compared with the Low-decrease group (5.2 ± 2.6 vs. 4.1 ± 2.3; mean difference: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.3 to 1.8; P = 0.005). …”
-
58
Baseline characteristics of patients.
Published 2023“…A total of 162 patients were included. The SOFA score on POD 5 was significantly higher in the High-decrease group compared with the Low-decrease group (5.2 ± 2.6 vs. 4.1 ± 2.3; mean difference: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.3 to 1.8; P = 0.005). …”
-
59
-
60