Search alternatives:
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
026 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
026 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
66141
-
66142
CH<sub>3</sub>–X Reductive Elimination Reactivity of Pt<sup>IV</sup>Me Complexes Supported by a Sulfonated CNN Pincer Ligand (X = OH, CF<sub>3</sub>CO<sub>2</sub>, PhNMe<sub>2</sub...
Published 2019“…In TFE or DMSO solutions at 22 °C, in the presence of PhNMe<sub>2</sub>, a quantitative formation of a C–N coupled product, PhNMe<sub>3</sub><sup>+</sup>, was observed for <b>6</b>–<b>8</b>, with the reactivity decreasing in the order <b>6</b> > <b>7</b> > <b>8</b>. …”
-
66143
Total fecal wet weight (A), % of fecal wet weight (%WW) (B), delta % fecal wet weight (Δ%WW) in interval I (C), delta % fecal wet weight (Δ%WW) in interval II (D), stool frequency...
Published 2023“…The dotted lines represent challenges on day 14 and day 35 of the study, and each symbol represents the mean and SEM of the group. Data (A, B, E, and F) were analyzed using repeated-measures Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) model and one-way ANOVA post-test was applied to check the linear trend the data in (C and D).…”
-
66144
EU Data.csv<b>EU Data-1:</b> Age, sex, and medications used in patients with Parkinson’s disease.<b>EU Data-2:</b> Experimental parameters during off and on states of anti-Parkinso...
Published 2025“…The rate of CSP duration shortening during cold pressure was significantly greater under the drug-on condition than under the drug-off condition (mean, 22% vs. 12%; p < 0.01). The change in CSP latency exhibited a significant mild correlation with the change in the NRS scores (p < 0.05). …”
-
66145
Floxed <i>Arg1-Cre</i> mice (8–12 weeks old) treated with the standard tamoxifen dosing regimen (A) show evidence of reduced liver arginase-1 enzyme activity and protein (n = 3 all...
Published 2015“…Enzyme activity was significantly decreased (*, <i>p</i><0.05) compared to the “baseline” measurement (Day -2). …”
-
66146
-
66147
-
66148
-
66149
Scatter plot intensities of the 10C→G KRAS mutant using multiple relative concentrations: The intensity values from the mixed samples (wild type with 10C→G mutant; G12A in amino ac...
Published 2017“…<p>Data points below background intensity are removed. The plots show a decreasing relative mutant concentration, dilution factor 2.5. …”
-
66150
Boxplots of basal area-related variables as estimated ordinally by observers (<i>ΔD<sub>user</sub></i> and <i>D<sub>forester</sub></i>) and as a continuous variable derived from pl...
Published 2014“…A) Annualized change in basal area between site re-visits as determined from plot-based forest surveys (<i>ΔBA</i>) vs. forest users' estimates of change in forest density (<i>ΔD<sub>user</sub></i>). “−1” means forest density has decreased, “0” means no change and “1” means forest density has increased. …”
-
66151
-
66152
Structure, Electrochemistry, and Magnetism of the Iron(III)-Substituted Keggin Dimer, [Fe<sub>6</sub>(OH)<sub>3</sub>(<i>A-</i>α<i>-</i>GeW<sub>9</sub>O<sub>34</sub>(OH)<sub>3</sub...
Published 2005“…Single-crystal X-ray analysis was carried out on Cs<sub>4</sub>Na<sub>7</sub>[Fe<sub>6</sub>(OH)<sub>3</sub>(<i>A</i><i>-</i>α<i>-</i>GeW<sub>9</sub>O<sub>34</sub>(OH)<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>]·30H<sub>2</sub>O, which crystallizes in the monoclinic system, space group <i>C</i><sub>2/<i>m</i></sub>, with <i>a</i> = 36.981(4) Å, <i>b</i> = 16.5759(15) Å, <i>c</i> = 16.0678(15) Å, β = 95.311(3)°, and <i>Z</i> = 4. …”
-
66153
(a) The low frequency/high frequency (LF/HF) ratio and (b) the HF of heart rate variability at rest (Rest (pre)), before (Pre-feeding), during (Feeding), after feeding (Post-feedin...
Published 2015“…<p>Fast, Slow and Fast with delayed feeding: See Tables <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0142899#pone.0142899.t001" target="_blank">1</a> & <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0142899#pone.0142899.t002" target="_blank">2</a>. a) significantly increased, compared with the Rest (pre) (paired t-test, <i>p</i> < 0.05 or better); t-values: –3.76, –4.03, and –3.50 at Pre-feeding, Feeding, and Post-feeding, respectively, in Fast; –2.94 at Pre-feeding in Slow; –5.59 at Pre-feeding in Fast with delayed feeding. b) significantly decreased, compared with the Rest (pre) (paired t-test, <i>p</i> < 0.05 or better); t-values: 3.56 at Pre-feeding in Fast and 4.81 in Fast with delayed feeding; m) significantly increased, compared with the Pre-feeding (paired t-test, <i>p</i> < 0.05 or better); t-values: -3.74 and -4.28 at Post-feeding and Rest (post), respectively, in Slow; -4.81 and 4.74 at Pre-feeding and Rest (post), respectively, in Fast with delayed feeding; n) significantly decreased, compared with the Pre-feeding (paired t-test, <i>p</i><0.05 or better); t-values: 3.14 and 3.44 at Post-feeding and Rest (post), respectively, in Slow; 4.96, 4.82 and 5.45 at Feeding, Post-feeding and Rest (post), respectively, in Fast with delayed feeding; x) significantly increased, compared with the Fast group (Post-feeding) (F(2, 19) = 5.69, <i>p</i><0.01) (Dunnett’s test); y<sub>1</sub>) significantly decreased, compared with the Fast group (Post-feeding) (F(2, 19) = 3.62, <i>p</i><0.05) (Dunnett’s test); y<sub>2</sub>)significantly decreased, compared with the Fast group (Post-feeding) (F(2, 19) = 9.91, <i>p</i><0.01)(Dunnett’s test).…”
-
66154
Terminal cooperator ratio depending on association propbability <i>A</i><sub><i>C</i></sub> (<i>x</i> axis), dissociation probability (<i>D</i><sub><i>C</i></sub>, y axis), propaga...
Published 2024“…Random dispersal (B left) shows a slight benefit for cooperators due to decreased competition at the new habitat, but only for high association rate and even higher dissociation rates. …”
-
66155
Sensitivity of the endemic Mf prevalence, breakpoint values, and TBRs to changes in the shape parameter of the negative binomial distribution, (<i>k</i>) describing the distributio...
Published 2008“…For anopheline intermediate hosts (B), both the maximum breakpoint and the TBR decreased with decreasing <i>k</i> (TBR = i) 306, ii) 271, iii) 233)). …”
-
66156
-
66157
Paraffin sections of the hippocampus at postnatal day (P)7 of Wistar rats stained with A/B) proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)/DAPI; double immunofluorescence staining with...
Published 2017“…<p>Hyperoxia in neonatal rats decreased the proliferation positive cells (PCNA+, green, <b>A/B</b>) and the expression of neuronal marker for neuronal progenitor cells (Nestin+, red, <b>C/D</b>), immature neurons (PSA-NCAM+, red, <b>E/F</b>), and mature postmitotic neurons (NeuN+, red, <b>G/H</b>). …”
-
66158
Filling a Gap: Electrochemical Property Comparison of the Completed Compound Series [Mo<sub>2</sub>(DArF)<sub><i>n</i></sub>(O<sub>2</sub>C‑Fc)<sub>4–<i>n</i></sub>] (DArF = <i>N</...
Published 2016“…These complexes complete the series of [Mo<sub>2</sub>(DArF)<sub><i>n</i></sub>(O<sub>2</sub>C-Fc)<sub>4–<i>n</i></sub>] (<i>n</i> = 4–0) type compounds, thus allowing for a comprehensive study. On the basis of the oxidation potential <i>E</i><sub>1/2</sub>([Mo<sub>2</sub>]<sup>4+</sup>/[Mo<sub>2</sub>]<sup>5+</sup>) of all Mo<sub>2</sub> complexes, ligand basicity is found to decrease in the order DAniF<sup>–</sup> > DTfmpF<sup>–</sup> > Fc–CO<sub>2</sub><sup>–</sup> ≫ CH<sub>3</sub>CN. …”
-
66159
Switching between single-E control (Fig 31) and dual-E control (Fig 29) as a function of <i>k</i><sub>6</sub> for different values of <i>k</i><sub>9</sub>, <i>k</i><sub>11</sub>, <...
Published 2022“…Initial concentrations: A<sub>0</sub>=2.0, E<sub>1,0</sub>=5.49 × 10<sup>−2</sup>, E<sub>2,0</sub>=5.21 × 10<sup>3</sup>, Ez<sub>0</sub>=7.4 × 10<sup>−14</sup>, (E<sub>1</sub>⋅Ez)<sub>0</sub>=9.09 × 10<sup>−8</sup>, (E<sub>1</sub>⋅Ez⋅E<sub>2</sub>)<sub>0</sub>=9.09 × 10<sup>−7</sup>, (EzE<sub>2</sub>)<sub>0</sub>=1.66 × 10<sup>−10</sup>.…”
-
66160