Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
17101
Image_7_Intracellular Staphylococcus aureus Infection Decreases Milk Protein Synthesis by Preventing Amino Acid Uptake in Bovine Mammary Epithelial Cells.tif
Published 2021“…Thus mTORC1 regulates the expression of SLC1A3 and SLC7A5 through NF-κB and STAT5. These findings constitute a model by which S. aureus infection suppresses milk protein synthesis by decreasing amino acids uptake in BMECs.…”
-
17102
Image_6_Intracellular Staphylococcus aureus Infection Decreases Milk Protein Synthesis by Preventing Amino Acid Uptake in Bovine Mammary Epithelial Cells.tif
Published 2021“…Thus mTORC1 regulates the expression of SLC1A3 and SLC7A5 through NF-κB and STAT5. These findings constitute a model by which S. aureus infection suppresses milk protein synthesis by decreasing amino acids uptake in BMECs.…”
-
17103
Image_1_Intracellular Staphylococcus aureus Infection Decreases Milk Protein Synthesis by Preventing Amino Acid Uptake in Bovine Mammary Epithelial Cells.tif
Published 2021“…Thus mTORC1 regulates the expression of SLC1A3 and SLC7A5 through NF-κB and STAT5. These findings constitute a model by which S. aureus infection suppresses milk protein synthesis by decreasing amino acids uptake in BMECs.…”
-
17104
Image_3_Intracellular Staphylococcus aureus Infection Decreases Milk Protein Synthesis by Preventing Amino Acid Uptake in Bovine Mammary Epithelial Cells.tif
Published 2021“…Thus mTORC1 regulates the expression of SLC1A3 and SLC7A5 through NF-κB and STAT5. These findings constitute a model by which S. aureus infection suppresses milk protein synthesis by decreasing amino acids uptake in BMECs.…”
-
17105
-
17106
-
17107
-
17108
-
17109
-
17110
-
17111
-
17112
Cobalt-Catalyzed C(sp<sup>2</sup>)–C(sp<sup>3</sup>) Suzuki–Miyaura Cross-Coupling Enabled by Well-Defined Precatalysts with L,X-Type Ligands
Published 2022“…The protocol enabled efficient C–C bond formation with a host of nucleophiles and electrophiles (36 examples, 34–95%) with precatalyst loadings of 5 mol %. …”
-
17113
Cobalt-Catalyzed C(sp<sup>2</sup>)–C(sp<sup>3</sup>) Suzuki–Miyaura Cross-Coupling Enabled by Well-Defined Precatalysts with L,X-Type Ligands
Published 2022“…The protocol enabled efficient C–C bond formation with a host of nucleophiles and electrophiles (36 examples, 34–95%) with precatalyst loadings of 5 mol %. …”
-
17114
Cobalt-Catalyzed C(sp<sup>2</sup>)–C(sp<sup>3</sup>) Suzuki–Miyaura Cross-Coupling Enabled by Well-Defined Precatalysts with L,X-Type Ligands
Published 2022“…The protocol enabled efficient C–C bond formation with a host of nucleophiles and electrophiles (36 examples, 34–95%) with precatalyst loadings of 5 mol %. …”
-
17115
Cobalt-Catalyzed C(sp<sup>2</sup>)–C(sp<sup>3</sup>) Suzuki–Miyaura Cross-Coupling Enabled by Well-Defined Precatalysts with L,X-Type Ligands
Published 2022“…The protocol enabled efficient C–C bond formation with a host of nucleophiles and electrophiles (36 examples, 34–95%) with precatalyst loadings of 5 mol %. …”
-
17116
Cobalt-Catalyzed C(sp<sup>2</sup>)–C(sp<sup>3</sup>) Suzuki–Miyaura Cross-Coupling Enabled by Well-Defined Precatalysts with L,X-Type Ligands
Published 2022“…The protocol enabled efficient C–C bond formation with a host of nucleophiles and electrophiles (36 examples, 34–95%) with precatalyst loadings of 5 mol %. …”
-
17117
-
17118
Rotational diffusion and shifts in FRET transfer efficiency <i>E</i>.
Published 2017“…<p>As the rotational diffusion decreases the mean transfer efficiency shifts significantly. …”
-
17119
-
17120