Showing 641 - 660 results of 102,794 for search '(( 5 ((a decrease) OR (we decrease)) ) OR ( 50 ((ns decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ))', query time: 1.04s Refine Results
  1. 641
  2. 642
  3. 643

    The Type 2 Diabetes Risk Allele of <i>TMEM154</i>-rs6813195 Associates with Decreased Beta Cell Function in a Study of 6,486 Danes by Marie Neergaard Harder (232759)

    Published 2015
    “…Significant associations between <i>TMEM154</i>-rs6813195 and the beta cell measures insulinogenic index and disposition index and between <i>FAF1</i>-rs17106184 and 2-hour serum insulin levels were selected for further investigation in additional Danish studies and results were combined in meta-analyses including up to 6,486 Danes.</p><p>Results</p><p>We confirmed associations with type 2 diabetes for five of the seven SNPs (<i>TMEM154</i>-rs6813195, <i>FAF1</i>-rs17106184, <i>POU5F1/TCF19</i>-rs3130501, <i>ARL15</i>-rs702634 and <i>ABCB9/MPHOSPH9</i>-rs4275659). …”
  4. 644
  5. 645

    There is a significant decrease in fibroblast, α-SMA, and Ly6C staining accompanied with a decrease in proliferation, and increase in cell death in the outflow vein removed <i>Iex-... by Akshaar Brahmbhatt (551498)

    Published 2014
    “…</b> Pooled data from the semiquantitative analysis for intensity of Fsp-1 staining in the vessel wall of the outflow vein specimens removed from <i>Iex-1</i> KO and WT mice. There is a significant decrease in the mean Fsp-1 staining in the <i>Iex-1</i> KO animals when compared to WT controls (P<0.05). …”
  6. 646

    DataSheet2_Treatment of wild-type mice with 2,3-butanediol, a urinary biomarker of Fmo5−/− mice, decreases plasma cholesterol and epididymal fat deposition.pdf by Sunil Veeravalli (5074115)

    Published 2022
    “…<p>We previously showed that Fmo5<sup>−/−</sup> mice exhibit a lean phenotype and slower metabolic ageing. …”
  7. 647

    DataSheet1_Treatment of wild-type mice with 2,3-butanediol, a urinary biomarker of Fmo5−/− mice, decreases plasma cholesterol and epididymal fat deposition.PDF by Sunil Veeravalli (5074115)

    Published 2022
    “…<p>We previously showed that Fmo5<sup>−/−</sup> mice exhibit a lean phenotype and slower metabolic ageing. …”
  8. 648
  9. 649
  10. 650
  11. 651
  12. 652
  13. 653

    The Transition from a Compensatory Increase to a Decrease in C-peptide During the Progression to Type 1 Diabetes and Its Relation to Risk by Heba M Ismail (9568748)

    Published 2022
    “…Conclusions</p> <p>A transition from an increase to a decrease in AUC C-peptide approximately 1.5 years pre-diagnosis was validated in two independent cohorts. …”
  14. 654
  15. 655

    S1 File - by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

    Published 2024
    “…Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”
  16. 656

    Detailed information on field experiments. by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

    Published 2024
    “…Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”
  17. 657

    List of symbols used in this study. by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

    Published 2024
    “…Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”
  18. 658

    Data sources for calibration and evaluation. by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

    Published 2024
    “…Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”
  19. 659
  20. 660