Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
741
-
742
SPRY4 transcript decreases for IDCs compared to normal tissue in the TCGA Breast dataset.
Published 2021“…<p>Data mining of the TCGA Breast dataset revealed a 1.53-fold decrease in SPRY4 mRNA expression in IDCs (n = 389) compared to non-cancerous breast tissue (n = 61). …”
-
743
-
744
-
745
-
746
-
747
Rdh10a deficient embryos have decreased expression of RA signaling responsive genes.
Published 2015“…<p>(A-F) ISH for <i>cyp26a1</i>, <i>hoxb5b</i>, <i>and dhrs3a</i> expression in control sibling and Rdh10a deficient embryos. …”
-
748
RT-qPCR analysis of congenital diaphragmatic hernia lungs showed an increase in distal epithelial progenitor and a decrease in type 1 alveolar cells.
Published 2019“…Graph showing the mean values of fold change of E17.5 CDH relative to those of olive oil control lungs. …”
-
749
Frictional Effects on RNA Folding: Speed Limit and Kramers Turnover
Published 2018“…In the high-friction regime (η ≳ 10<sup>–5</sup> Pa·s), for both HP and PK, <i>k</i><sub>F</sub> values decrease as 1/η, whereas in the low friction regime, <i>k</i><sub>F</sub> values increase as η increases, leading to a maximum folding rate at a moderate viscosity (∼10<sup>–6</sup> Pa·s), which is the Kramers turnover. …”
-
750
-
751
-
752
Repetitive stress induces a decrease in sound-evoked activity.
Published 2025“…(d) Noise-evoked activity rates at different noise intensities for chronically tracked PV cells in baseline and repeated stress conditions (<i>N</i> = 5 mice, <i>n</i> = 31 neurons, mean ± SE). Activity rates decreased during repeated stress compared to baseline (2-way ANOVA, condition F = 49.6, <i>p</i> = 2.6 × 10<sup>−12</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 1.94, <i>p</i> = 0.02, nested ANOVA (mouse nested within session), F = 56.5, <i>p</i> = 8.8 × 10<sup>−14</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 3.5, <i>p</i> = 3.5 × 10<sup>−05</sup>). …”
-
753
-
754
-
755
-
756
-
757
-
758
-
759
-
760