Showing 104,141 - 104,160 results of 107,763 for search '(( 5 ((mean decrease) OR (a decrease)) ) OR ( e ((non decrease) OR (point decrease)) ))', query time: 1.21s Refine Results
  1. 104141

    Data_Sheet_6_Changes in Metabolism and Proteostasis Drive Aging Phenotype in Aplysia californica Sensory Neurons.PDF by Nicholas S. Kron (9377615)

    Published 2020
    “…The marine mollusk Aplysia californica (Aplysia) is a premier model for the nervous system uniquely suited to investigation of neuronal aging due to uniquely identifiable neurons and molecular techniques available in this model. …”
  2. 104142

    Table_4_Changes in Metabolism and Proteostasis Drive Aging Phenotype in Aplysia californica Sensory Neurons.xlsx by Nicholas S. Kron (9377615)

    Published 2020
    “…The marine mollusk Aplysia californica (Aplysia) is a premier model for the nervous system uniquely suited to investigation of neuronal aging due to uniquely identifiable neurons and molecular techniques available in this model. …”
  3. 104143

    Table_7_Changes in Metabolism and Proteostasis Drive Aging Phenotype in Aplysia californica Sensory Neurons.xlsx by Nicholas S. Kron (9377615)

    Published 2020
    “…The marine mollusk Aplysia californica (Aplysia) is a premier model for the nervous system uniquely suited to investigation of neuronal aging due to uniquely identifiable neurons and molecular techniques available in this model. …”
  4. 104144

    Data_Sheet_1_Changes in Metabolism and Proteostasis Drive Aging Phenotype in Aplysia californica Sensory Neurons.PDF by Nicholas S. Kron (9377615)

    Published 2020
    “…The marine mollusk Aplysia californica (Aplysia) is a premier model for the nervous system uniquely suited to investigation of neuronal aging due to uniquely identifiable neurons and molecular techniques available in this model. …”
  5. 104145

    Data_Sheet_3_Changes in Metabolism and Proteostasis Drive Aging Phenotype in Aplysia californica Sensory Neurons.XLSX by Nicholas S. Kron (9377615)

    Published 2020
    “…The marine mollusk Aplysia californica (Aplysia) is a premier model for the nervous system uniquely suited to investigation of neuronal aging due to uniquely identifiable neurons and molecular techniques available in this model. …”
  6. 104146

    <b>Gene x environment interactions as drivers of lifespan variation in nematodes</b> by Justin Havird (2812975)

    Published 2025
    “…Healthspan (measured as worm activity) generally decreased with age, but in different ways for different genetic strains. …”
  7. 104147

    DataSheet_1_Increased PD-1+Foxp3+ γδ T cells associate with poor overall survival for patients with acute myeloid leukemia.pdf by Jiamian Zheng (12067958)

    Published 2022
    “…</p>Results<p>We found that PD-1 gene was positively correlated with FOXP3 gene and highly co-expressed PD-1 and FOXP3 genes were associated with poor overall survival (OS) from TCGA database. Then, we detected a skewed distribution of γδ T cells with increased Vδ1 and decreased Vδ2 T cell subsets in AML. …”
  8. 104148
  9. 104149

    Table3_Association between OPG polymorphisms and osteoporosis risk: An updated meta-analysis.docx by Xu Han (141301)

    Published 2022
    “…At the same time, the OPG G1181C polymorphism reduces the risk of osteoporosis (C vs G: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.74–0.95; CC vs GG: OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60–0.93; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67–0.95; CC vs GG + GC: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.70–1.00). Moreover, a significantly decreased risk of osteoporosis was also discovered in Asian (C vs G: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66–0.98; CC vs GG: OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.47–0.95; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.58–0.95) and the female (C vs G: OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75–0.97; CC vs GG: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61–0.96; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.66–0.95). …”
  10. 104150
  11. 104151
  12. 104152

    Table1_Association between OPG polymorphisms and osteoporosis risk: An updated meta-analysis.docx by Xu Han (141301)

    Published 2022
    “…At the same time, the OPG G1181C polymorphism reduces the risk of osteoporosis (C vs G: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.74–0.95; CC vs GG: OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60–0.93; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67–0.95; CC vs GG + GC: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.70–1.00). Moreover, a significantly decreased risk of osteoporosis was also discovered in Asian (C vs G: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66–0.98; CC vs GG: OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.47–0.95; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.58–0.95) and the female (C vs G: OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75–0.97; CC vs GG: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61–0.96; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.66–0.95). …”
  13. 104153

    Table2_Association between OPG polymorphisms and osteoporosis risk: An updated meta-analysis.docx by Xu Han (141301)

    Published 2022
    “…At the same time, the OPG G1181C polymorphism reduces the risk of osteoporosis (C vs G: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.74–0.95; CC vs GG: OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60–0.93; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67–0.95; CC vs GG + GC: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.70–1.00). Moreover, a significantly decreased risk of osteoporosis was also discovered in Asian (C vs G: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66–0.98; CC vs GG: OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.47–0.95; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.58–0.95) and the female (C vs G: OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75–0.97; CC vs GG: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61–0.96; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.66–0.95). …”
  14. 104154

    Table4_Association between OPG polymorphisms and osteoporosis risk: An updated meta-analysis.docx by Xu Han (141301)

    Published 2022
    “…At the same time, the OPG G1181C polymorphism reduces the risk of osteoporosis (C vs G: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.74–0.95; CC vs GG: OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60–0.93; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67–0.95; CC vs GG + GC: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.70–1.00). Moreover, a significantly decreased risk of osteoporosis was also discovered in Asian (C vs G: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66–0.98; CC vs GG: OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.47–0.95; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.58–0.95) and the female (C vs G: OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75–0.97; CC vs GG: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61–0.96; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.66–0.95). …”
  15. 104155
  16. 104156
  17. 104157
  18. 104158
  19. 104159
  20. 104160