Showing 2,121 - 2,140 results of 42,962 for search '(( 5 ((mean decrease) OR (point decrease)) ) OR ( 100 ((nm decrease) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 1.17s Refine Results
  1. 2121

    Image 1_Atractylenolide-I restore intestinal barrier function by targeting the S100A9/AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway.tif by Chen Chen (6544)

    Published 2025
    “…Mechanistically, recombinant human S100A9 protein was found to induce a decrease in intracellular Ca<sup>2+</sup> concentration, while AT-1 regulated the expression of tight junction proteins via modulation of the AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway. …”
  2. 2122
  3. 2123
  4. 2124
  5. 2125
  6. 2126
  7. 2127
  8. 2128
  9. 2129

    Decreased self-renewal capacity associated with senescence was prevented in human MSCs following treatment with Ki16425, an LPA<sub>1</sub>/LPA<sub>3</sub> antagonist. by Masahiko Kanehira (183764)

    Published 2012
    “…CFU-F colonies initiated from the treated cells (passage 5, 100 cells) were counted after 15 days of normal culture. …”
  10. 2130
  11. 2131
  12. 2132
  13. 2133

    A R13A point mutation in C4 attenuates CLCuMuV infection. by Asigul Ismayil (5698946)

    Published 2018
    “…<i>eIF4α</i> was used as an internal control. Values represent means ± SE from three independent experiments. <b>(C)</b> The mutant CLCuMuV carrying C4<sup>R13A</sup> (CLCuMuV-C4<sup>R13A</sup>), which contains a R13A mutation in <i>C4</i>, showed the decreased viral symptom compared to wild type CLCuMuV. …”
  14. 2134
  15. 2135
  16. 2136

    List of Included studies. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  17. 2137

    The search strategy in three databases. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  18. 2138

    A summary of the included study characteristics. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  19. 2139

    NIH score. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  20. 2140

    List of excluded studies. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”