Search alternatives:
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
841
C.<sub>-100~-110</sub> caused a decrease in the promoter activity but the WT sequence of 11bp is neither an E-box nor a MEF2C binding site.
Published 2015“…<sub>-100~-110</sub> (<i>x</i>) demonstrated a decreased luciferase activity for about 30% as compared to each WT counterparts. …”
-
842
-
843
-
844
-
845
-
846
-
847
Analysis of the <sup>1</sup> H–<sup>15</sup>N HSQC spectrum of the RAGE V domain with unlabeled S100A1.
Published 2018“…Cross-peaks displaying significantly decreased intensity are shown in green boxes.</p> <p>(B) Bar graph analysis representing the intensity change (I/I<sub>0</sub>) of cross-peaks of <sup>15</sup>N V domain to <sup>15</sup>N V domain complex with S100A1 versus residue numbers of RAGE V domain (24–128). …”
-
848
Analysis of the <sup>1</sup>H–<sup>15</sup>N HSQC spectra of S100A1 in complex with the unlabeled RAGE V domain.
Published 2018“…</p> <p>(D) Ribbon representing the structure of homo-dimer. The monomers of S100A1 homodimer are colored in green and blue.</p> <p>(E) A monomer of S100A1 and residues that exhibit significantly decreasing cross-peak signals are mapped on the structure in magenta.…”
-
849
Oscillatory Dynamics Supporting Semantic Cognition: MEG Evidence for the Contribution of the Anterior Temporal Lobe Hub and Modality-Specific Spokes
Published 2017“…In ATL, there were two phases of response: from around 100 ms post-stimulus there were phasic bursts of low gamma activity resulting in <i>reductions</i> in oscillatory power, relative to a baseline period, that were modulated by both category and specificity; this was followed by more sustained power decreases across frequency bands from 250 ms onwards. …”
-
850
-
851
-
852
-
853
-
854
-
855
Individual data and box plots on ∑PBB of all samples.
Published 2024“…<p>Individual data (A) indicate an increase in the early 1980’s, a peak in mid-late 1990’s followed by a decrease depending on study area. ∑PBB means (x), medians (horizontal line), interquartile ranges, min and max data points excluding outliers (exceeding 1.5 times the interquartile range; bars) and individual values of all samples (1972–2005) in different study areas (B). …”
-
856
-
857
-
858
Individual data and box plots on ∑TEQs of all samples.
Published 2024“…PCDD/F TEQ + PCB TEQ means (x), medians (horizontal line), interquartile ranges, min and max data points excluding outliers (exceeding 1.5 times the interquartile range; bars) and individual values of all samples (1972–2017) in different study areas (B). …”
-
859
Individual data and box plots on ∑PCB and PCB TEQs of all samples.
Published 2024“…In right panel ∑PCB (B) and PCB TEQ (D) means (x), medians (horizontal line), interquartile ranges, min and max datapoints excluding outliers (exceeding 1.5 times the interquartile range; bars) and individual values of all samples (1972–2017) in different study areas are shown. …”
-
860
Individual data and box plots on ∑PCDD/F and PCDD/F-TEQs of all samples.
Published 2024“…<p>In left panel ∑PCDD/F (A) and PCDD/F TEQ (C) show decreasing trends since 1980’s-1990’s until 2010. In right panel ∑PCDD/F (B) and PCDD/F TEQ (D) means (x), medians (horizontal line), interquartile ranges, min and max datapoints excluding outliers (exceeding 1.5 times the interquartile range; bars) and individual values of all samples (1972–2017) in different study areas are shown. …”