Showing 11,621 - 11,640 results of 102,439 for search '(( 5 ((ng decrease) OR (a decrease)) ) OR ( 50 ((nn decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ))', query time: 1.43s Refine Results
  1. 11621

    METH decreased basal pERK1/2 levels and potentiated ERK1/2 phosphorylation induced by 6-OHDA. by Amina El Ayadi (341955)

    Published 2013
    “…METH decreased activation of ERK 1/2 in a concentration-dependent manner (0, 0.5, and 1 mM at the 24 hr time point) and enhanced the activation of ERK1/2 after 6-OHDA exposure. …”
  2. 11622
  3. 11623
  4. 11624
  5. 11625
  6. 11626
  7. 11627

    Infusion with amyloi-β increased the level of TNF-α in the brain and the treatment with pomegranate peel extract significantly decreased the inflammatory process. by Maressa Caldeira Morzelle (3339822)

    Published 2016
    “…The treatment with Aβ + PPE (n = 6) decreased the TNF-α level when compared to the Control (n = 6) and Aβ (n = 5) groups. …”
  8. 11628
  9. 11629
  10. 11630
  11. 11631
  12. 11632
  13. 11633
  14. 11634
  15. 11635
  16. 11636
  17. 11637

    Interfacial Adhesion Forces of Hydrate Particles in the Presence of Hydrate Inhibitors by Wenjuan Zhang (234517)

    Published 2022
    “…The hydrate adhesion forces decreased by 90.5–93.0% and 76.6–92.7% with an increase in the concentration of Span 80 and lecithin, respectively, from 0.1 to 1 wt %. …”
  18. 11638

    Interfacial Adhesion Forces of Hydrate Particles in the Presence of Hydrate Inhibitors by Wenjuan Zhang (234517)

    Published 2022
    “…The hydrate adhesion forces decreased by 90.5–93.0% and 76.6–92.7% with an increase in the concentration of Span 80 and lecithin, respectively, from 0.1 to 1 wt %. …”
  19. 11639
  20. 11640

    S1/2<sup>-/-</sup> mice display novelty induced hyperactivity, decreased anxiety and exploratory behavior and working memory disturbances. by Paul C. Baier (650225)

    Published 2014
    “…I-J) S1/2<sup>-/-</sup> mice showed increased number of working errors searching for a hidden platform on the first (I) (E<sub>genotype</sub> F<sub>(1,55)</sub> = 3.93; p = 0.0524; I<sub>genotype×time</sub> F<sub>(3,165)</sub> = 2.68; p = 0.0486) and the second (J) day of experiment (E<sub>genotype</sub> F<sub>(1,55)</sub> = 9.05; p = 0.0044) and I<sub>genotype×time</sub> F<sub>(5,275)</sub> = 2.34; p = 0.0422). …”