Search alternatives:
ng decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
ng decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
5461
Patient characteristics.
Published 2024“…On the XJTU-EC dataset, CM-UNet achieves an excellent segmentation performance, and ECRNet obtains an accuracy of 98.50%, a precision of 99.32% and a sensitivity of 97.67% on the test set, which outperforms other competitive classical models. …”
-
5462
Comparison with baseline methods.
Published 2024“…On the XJTU-EC dataset, CM-UNet achieves an excellent segmentation performance, and ECRNet obtains an accuracy of 98.50%, a precision of 99.32% and a sensitivity of 97.67% on the test set, which outperforms other competitive classical models. …”
-
5463
The details of the channel attention module.
Published 2024“…On the XJTU-EC dataset, CM-UNet achieves an excellent segmentation performance, and ECRNet obtains an accuracy of 98.50%, a precision of 99.32% and a sensitivity of 97.67% on the test set, which outperforms other competitive classical models. …”
-
5464
Ablation experiments.
Published 2024“…On the XJTU-EC dataset, CM-UNet achieves an excellent segmentation performance, and ECRNet obtains an accuracy of 98.50%, a precision of 99.32% and a sensitivity of 97.67% on the test set, which outperforms other competitive classical models. …”
-
5465
Pathological diagnosis.
Published 2024“…On the XJTU-EC dataset, CM-UNet achieves an excellent segmentation performance, and ECRNet obtains an accuracy of 98.50%, a precision of 99.32% and a sensitivity of 97.67% on the test set, which outperforms other competitive classical models. …”
-
5466
The details of ECRNet.
Published 2024“…On the XJTU-EC dataset, CM-UNet achieves an excellent segmentation performance, and ECRNet obtains an accuracy of 98.50%, a precision of 99.32% and a sensitivity of 97.67% on the test set, which outperforms other competitive classical models. …”
-
5467
-
5468
-
5469
Raw data for figures and tables in the paper.
Published 2024“…<i>rwandensis</i> could promote the transformation of Pb fractions and a functional change in the soil bacterial community, ultimately decreasing Pb accumulation in the biomass and promoting the development of maize.…”
-
5470
-
5471
Improving Stability of CO<sub>2</sub> Electroreduction by Incorporating Ag NPs in N‑Doped Ordered Mesoporous Carbon Structures
Published 2023“…The optimized Ag/soft-NOMC catalysts showed both a promising selectivity (∼80%) and stability compared with commercial Ag NPs while decreasing the loading of the transition metal by more than 50%. …”
-
5472
Improving Stability of CO<sub>2</sub> Electroreduction by Incorporating Ag NPs in N‑Doped Ordered Mesoporous Carbon Structures
Published 2023“…The optimized Ag/soft-NOMC catalysts showed both a promising selectivity (∼80%) and stability compared with commercial Ag NPs while decreasing the loading of the transition metal by more than 50%. …”
-
5473
Flow chart of the study participants.
Published 2025“…Neonatal morbidity was lower: APGAR score <7 at 5 minutes (aPR: 0.36; 95%CI: 0.26–0.50), transfer to postnatal ward with mother (aPR: 9.27; 95%CI: 2.23–38.48), transfer to neonatal unit (aPR: 0.66; 95%CI: 0.56–0.78). …”
-
5474
Suggested modifications for the BabySaver.
Published 2025“…Neonatal morbidity was lower: APGAR score <7 at 5 minutes (aPR: 0.36; 95%CI: 0.26–0.50), transfer to postnatal ward with mother (aPR: 9.27; 95%CI: 2.23–38.48), transfer to neonatal unit (aPR: 0.66; 95%CI: 0.56–0.78). …”
-
5475
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…The investigation focuses on two types of microtextured surfaces with totally different surface peak–valley features: a negatively skewed surface with micropit arrays (<i>Ssk</i> < 0) and a positively skewed surface with micropillar arrays (<i>Ssk</i> > 0). …”
-
5476
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…The investigation focuses on two types of microtextured surfaces with totally different surface peak–valley features: a negatively skewed surface with micropit arrays (<i>Ssk</i> < 0) and a positively skewed surface with micropillar arrays (<i>Ssk</i> > 0). …”
-
5477
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…The investigation focuses on two types of microtextured surfaces with totally different surface peak–valley features: a negatively skewed surface with micropit arrays (<i>Ssk</i> < 0) and a positively skewed surface with micropillar arrays (<i>Ssk</i> > 0). …”
-
5478
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…The investigation focuses on two types of microtextured surfaces with totally different surface peak–valley features: a negatively skewed surface with micropit arrays (<i>Ssk</i> < 0) and a positively skewed surface with micropillar arrays (<i>Ssk</i> > 0). …”
-
5479
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…The investigation focuses on two types of microtextured surfaces with totally different surface peak–valley features: a negatively skewed surface with micropit arrays (<i>Ssk</i> < 0) and a positively skewed surface with micropillar arrays (<i>Ssk</i> > 0). …”
-
5480
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…The investigation focuses on two types of microtextured surfaces with totally different surface peak–valley features: a negatively skewed surface with micropit arrays (<i>Ssk</i> < 0) and a positively skewed surface with micropillar arrays (<i>Ssk</i> > 0). …”