Showing 701 - 720 results of 16,260 for search '(( 5 ((ng decrease) OR (nn decrease)) ) OR ( 50 ((we decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ))', query time: 0.83s Refine Results
  1. 701
  2. 702
  3. 703

    Paeameter ranges and optimal values. by Zhen Zhao (159931)

    Published 2025
    “…Firstly, recursive feature elimination using cross validation (RFECV), maximum information coefficient (MIC), and mean decrease accuracy (MDA) methods were utilized to select population distribution feature factors. …”
  4. 704

    Improved random forest algorithm. by Zhen Zhao (159931)

    Published 2025
    “…Firstly, recursive feature elimination using cross validation (RFECV), maximum information coefficient (MIC), and mean decrease accuracy (MDA) methods were utilized to select population distribution feature factors. …”
  5. 705

    Datasets used in the study area. by Zhen Zhao (159931)

    Published 2025
    “…Firstly, recursive feature elimination using cross validation (RFECV), maximum information coefficient (MIC), and mean decrease accuracy (MDA) methods were utilized to select population distribution feature factors. …”
  6. 706

    Evaluation of the improved random forest model. by Zhen Zhao (159931)

    Published 2025
    “…Firstly, recursive feature elimination using cross validation (RFECV), maximum information coefficient (MIC), and mean decrease accuracy (MDA) methods were utilized to select population distribution feature factors. …”
  7. 707

    Comparison of model metrics. by Zhen Zhao (159931)

    Published 2025
    “…Firstly, recursive feature elimination using cross validation (RFECV), maximum information coefficient (MIC), and mean decrease accuracy (MDA) methods were utilized to select population distribution feature factors. …”
  8. 708

    Flowchart of population spatialization. by Zhen Zhao (159931)

    Published 2025
    “…Firstly, recursive feature elimination using cross validation (RFECV), maximum information coefficient (MIC), and mean decrease accuracy (MDA) methods were utilized to select population distribution feature factors. …”
  9. 709
  10. 710
  11. 711
  12. 712
  13. 713
  14. 714
  15. 715
  16. 716
  17. 717

    Patterns of lifetime use of substances by gender. by Daniel Waiganjo Kinyanjui (15877725)

    Published 2023
    “…The lifetime prevalence of substance use was 41.5%, while that of alcohol use was 36%. For both, a higher mean neuroticism score [substance use- (AOR 1.05, 95%CI; 1, 1.10: p = 0.013); alcohol use- (AOR 1.04, 95%CI; 0.99, 1.09: p = 0.032)] showed increased odds of lifetime use, while a higher mean agreeableness score [substance use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.008); alcohol use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.032)] showed decreased odds of lifetime use. …”
  18. 718

    S1 Data - by Daniel Waiganjo Kinyanjui (15877725)

    Published 2023
    “…The lifetime prevalence of substance use was 41.5%, while that of alcohol use was 36%. For both, a higher mean neuroticism score [substance use- (AOR 1.05, 95%CI; 1, 1.10: p = 0.013); alcohol use- (AOR 1.04, 95%CI; 0.99, 1.09: p = 0.032)] showed increased odds of lifetime use, while a higher mean agreeableness score [substance use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.008); alcohol use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.032)] showed decreased odds of lifetime use. …”
  19. 719

    Factors associated with substance use. by Daniel Waiganjo Kinyanjui (15877725)

    Published 2023
    “…The lifetime prevalence of substance use was 41.5%, while that of alcohol use was 36%. For both, a higher mean neuroticism score [substance use- (AOR 1.05, 95%CI; 1, 1.10: p = 0.013); alcohol use- (AOR 1.04, 95%CI; 0.99, 1.09: p = 0.032)] showed increased odds of lifetime use, while a higher mean agreeableness score [substance use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.008); alcohol use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.032)] showed decreased odds of lifetime use. …”
  20. 720

    Factors associated with personality traits. by Daniel Waiganjo Kinyanjui (15877725)

    Published 2023
    “…The lifetime prevalence of substance use was 41.5%, while that of alcohol use was 36%. For both, a higher mean neuroticism score [substance use- (AOR 1.05, 95%CI; 1, 1.10: p = 0.013); alcohol use- (AOR 1.04, 95%CI; 0.99, 1.09: p = 0.032)] showed increased odds of lifetime use, while a higher mean agreeableness score [substance use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.008); alcohol use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.032)] showed decreased odds of lifetime use. …”