Showing 161 - 180 results of 42,976 for search '(( 5 ((ng decrease) OR (we decrease)) ) OR ( 50 ((a decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ))', query time: 0.76s Refine Results
  1. 161
  2. 162
  3. 163
  4. 164

    Exposure to low CO<sub>2</sub> levels decreases ER cholesterol levels. by Nityanand Bolshette (17396845)

    Published 2023
    “…<b>(D, E)</b> The free cholesterol and cholesterol ester levels in the ER membrane from the cells as in <b>(C)</b>, were quantified with shotgun lipidomics analysis (see <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002367#pbio.3002367.s007" target="_blank">S7 Fig</a> and <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002367#pbio.3002367.s012" target="_blank">S5 Table</a>) (mean ± SE, <i>n</i> = 3 independent experiments, **<i>P</i> < 0.01, *<i>P</i> < 0.05, nonsignificant (ns) two-sided Student’s <i>t</i> test). …”
  5. 165
  6. 166
  7. 167
  8. 168

    Cinacalcet administered early in the inactive phase markedly decrease parathyroid Ki-67 index. by Søren Egstrand (10906087)

    Published 2025
    “…(B) For each group, the median Ki-67 immunostained parathyroid sample closest to the group mean is shown. Each dot represents one sample. Scale bars measures 50μm.…”
  9. 169

    Increased osteoblastic activity and decreased osteoclastogenesis in TgLRAP cells <i>in vitro</i>. by Naoto Haruyama (487384)

    Published 2021
    “…Compared with the co-culture of WT BMCs and WT calvarial cells (WT / WT), the number of osteoclasts were significantly decreased at 50% in the co-cultures of TgLRAP BMCs and TgLRAP calvarial cells (TgLRAP / TgLRAP) (graph). …”
  10. 170

    Decreased ISCs and increased goblet cells after intestinal specific loss of MLL1. by Neha Goveas (11790822)

    Published 2021
    “…(C) Decrease in ISC markers, OLFM4 and SOX9 in <i>Mll1</i><sup><i>FC/FC; Vil-Cre-ERT2/+</i></sup> intestinal sections. …”
  11. 171
  12. 172

    Image5_Decreasing incidence and mortality of lung cancer in Hungary between 2011 and 2021 revealed by robust estimates reconciling multiple data sources.TIFF by Gabriella Gálffy (177759)

    Published 2024
    “…The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a statistically significant decrease in lung cancer incidence, especially in the 50–59 age group (both sexes).…”
  13. 173

    Plot of mean vigor by group and time. by Kunal Desai (18784208)

    Published 2024
    “…There was a general trend towards increases in CS in the Heartfulness group compared to the gratitude group. …”
  14. 174

    Plot of mean Burnout by group and time. by Kunal Desai (18784208)

    Published 2024
    “…There was a general trend towards increases in CS in the Heartfulness group compared to the gratitude group. …”
  15. 175
  16. 176

    S1 File - by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

    Published 2024
    “…Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”
  17. 177

    Detailed information on field experiments. by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

    Published 2024
    “…Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”
  18. 178

    List of symbols used in this study. by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

    Published 2024
    “…Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”
  19. 179

    Data sources for calibration and evaluation. by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

    Published 2024
    “…Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”
  20. 180