Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
non decrease » note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
non decrease » note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
106121
-
106122
-
106123
-
106124
-
106125
-
106126
-
106127
-
106128
-
106129
-
106130
Table 1_Eculizumab for the acute attack of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.docx
Published 2025“…One LETM patient developed a urinary tract infection, and another had Klebsiella pneumoniae pneumonia; all infections were effectively treated.…”
-
106131
-
106132
-
106133
-
106134
-
106135
-
106136
-
106137
Radiation–Induced Signaling Results in Mitochondrial Impairment in Mouse Heart at 4 Weeks after Exposure to X-Rays
Published 2011“…Our results show that doses, equivalent to a single dose in radiotherapy, cause long-lasting changes in mitochondrial oxidative metabolism and mitochondria-associated cytoskeleton. …”
-
106138
-
106139
Consort flow diagram of the participants.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Methods</p><p>Forty-five healthy adults participated in this study. They were randomly assigned in a crossover design involving three breathing techniques: flow incentive spirometry, volume incentive spirometry, and costal breathing exercises with sustained maximal inspiration. …”
-
106140
Table_1_Genetic polymorphisms in CYP4F2 may be associated with lung cancer risk among females and no-smoking Chinese population.docx
Published 2023“…</p>Results<p>This study observed that rs12459936 was linked to an increased risk of LC in no-smoking participants (allele: OR = 1.38, p = 0.035; homozygote: OR = 2.00, p = 0.035; additive: OR = 1.40, p = 0.034) and females (allele: OR = 1.64, p = 0.002; homozygote: OR = 2.57, p = 0.006; heterozygous: OR = 2.56, p = 0.001; dominant: OR = 2.56, p < 0.002; additive: OR = 1.67, p = 0.002). Adversely, there was a significantly decreased LC risk for rs3093110 in no-smoking participants (heterozygous: OR = 0.56, p = 0.027; dominant: OR = 0.58, p = 0.035), rs3093193 (allele: OR = 0.66, p = 0.016; homozygote: OR = 0.33, p = 0.011; recessive: OR = 0.38, p = 0.021; additive: OR = 0.64, p = 0.014), rs3093144 (recessive: OR = 0.20, p = 0.045), and rs3093110 (allele: OR = 0.54, p = 0.010; heterozygous: OR = 0.50, p = 0.014; dominant: OR = 0.49, p = 0.010; additive: OR = 0.54, p = 0.011) in females.…”