Search alternatives:
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
nm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
nm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
601
-
602
Rescue of <i>MBNL</i>1 e5 and <i>MBNL</i>2 e5 and e8 mis-splicing by erythromycin lactobionate treatment at 10 DPI.
Published 2022“…Note the decreased inclusion of <i>MBNL</i>1 e5 (+e5) and <i>MBNL</i>2 e5 (+e5) in DM1 hiNeurons treated with 35 or 65 μM erythromycin for 48 h relative to placebo treated cells. …”
-
603
Spatial representation of mean annual soil loss increase/decrease derived with the different modeling centers (rows) and time steps (columns) with the SSP5-8.5.
Published 2023“…<p>Spatial representation of mean annual soil loss increase/decrease derived with the different modeling centers (rows) and time steps (columns) with the SSP5-8.5.…”
-
604
-
605
Exposures to PM<sub>2.5</sub>, PM<sub>10</sub> and Nitrogen dioxide.
Published 2024“…A sizeable proportion also had annual mean exposures that surpassed the WHO PM<sub>10</sub> (14.8%) and nitrogen dioxide (63%) recommended thresholds. …”
-
606
-
607
-
608
List of Included studies.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
609
The search strategy in three databases.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
610
NIH score.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
611
List of excluded studies.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
612
-
613
-
614
-
615
-
616
-
617
-
618
-
619
-
620