Showing 1 - 20 results of 173,573 for search '(( 5 ((nn decrease) OR (point decrease)) ) OR ((( 10 _ decrease ) OR ( 10 a decrease ))))', query time: 1.57s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

    Downregulation of DOM decreases the abundance of PER and TIM. by Zhenxing Liu (399809)

    Published 2019
    “…Downregulation of DOM decreased PER levels at CT1-5 and CT17-21. (Scale bar: 50 um.) …”
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9

    Knockdown of FZD10 results in a decrease in cell proliferation in the neural tube. by Abdulmajeed Fahad Alrefaei (8968607)

    Published 2020
    “…(F) Quantification of the number of pH3 positive cells per section in the neural tube electroporated with FZD10 shRNA vector compared to the non-electroporated side showed that there was a statistically significant decrease in the number of pH3 positive cells (students t-test (paired)).…”
  10. 10
  11. 11

    mGluR5 receptor decreased glycinergic currents. by Zi-Yang Zhang (4988555)

    Published 2019
    “…(<b>E</b>) The inhibitory effect of CHPG on GlyR-IPSCs was not blocked by intracellularly loaded GDP-β-S (62.3 ± 6.4% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[6] = 2.782, <i>p</i> = 0.032), chelerythrine (60.9 ± 11.3% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[6] = 2.705, <i>p</i> = 0.035), or Ro-32-0432 (69.9 ± 3.2% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[5] = 8.495, <i>p</i> < 0.001). (<b>F</b>) Postsynaptic loading of U-0126 or PD98059 prevented CHPG from decreasing glycinergic responses (U-0126, 107.6 ± 10.4% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[8] = 0.997, <i>p</i> = 0.348; PD98059, 93.1 ± 5.0% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[5] = 0.883, <i>p</i> = 0.418). …”
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20

    Data_Sheet_1_The Risky Decrease of Fishing Reference Points Under Climate Change.docx by Morgane Travers-Trolet (548023)

    Published 2020
    “…The model was first parameterized and run to fit the historical situation (2000–2009) and then used to assess the ecosystem state for the 2050–2059 period, using two contrasting climate change scenarios (RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5). For each condition, a monospecific MSY estimation routine was performed by varying species fishing mortality independently and allowed estimation of reference points for each species. …”