Showing 381 - 400 results of 229,702 for search '(( 5 ((non decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ) OR ( 10 ((we decrease) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 1.76s Refine Results
  1. 381

    NIH score. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  2. 382

    List of excluded studies. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  3. 383
  4. 384
  5. 385

    Reduction of SIRT1 during DNA damage decreases the number of silent clones that have methylation. by Heather M. O'Hagan (271283)

    Published 2008
    “…One representative bisulfite sequenced clone is presented for each HSVTK silent clone. (B) A dot plot of the mean number of CpGs methylated per HSVTK silenced clone from either un-siRNA treated cells (untreated) (<a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000155#pgen-1000155-g005" target="_blank">Figure 5D & E</a>), non-target siRNA treated cells (NT), or SIRT1 siRNA treated cells (SIRT1). …”
  6. 386
  7. 387
  8. 388
  9. 389
  10. 390
  11. 391
  12. 392
  13. 393
  14. 394
  15. 395
  16. 396

    The ratio between the bias in the naïve SI and shuffle SI decreases with tuning specificity, but not with sample size. by Liron Sheintuch (12078310)

    Published 2022
    “…Data pooled from N = 9 simulations, each corresponding to behavioral data from a different mouse. (B) The bias ratio (mean ± SEM) decreases as a function of the true SI for a sample size of 1 minute (blue), 5 minutes (cyan) and 20 minutes (green). …”
  17. 397
  18. 398
  19. 399
  20. 400