Showing 261 - 280 results of 28,177 for search '(( 5 ((ppm decrease) OR (((nn decrease) OR (mean decrease)))) ) OR ( 2 fold decrease ))', query time: 1.07s Refine Results
  1. 261
  2. 262
  3. 263

    Panel (a) shows ensemble mean global mean near-surface air temperature in historical and RCP simulations from CanESM2 by Nathan P Gillett (557010)

    Published 2013
    “…Shaded bands show estimates of the 5–95% uncertainty ranges in the ensemble mean ratios, derived by taking the standard deviation of the ratio from each of the five independent pairs of simulations with and without aerosol changes, dividing by the square root of five (the ensemble size), and multiplying by a Student-<em>t</em> statistic with a cutoff value of 0.05 and four degrees of freedom (one less than the ensemble size). …”
  4. 264
  5. 265

    Scattering Properties of MoS<sub>2</sub> Edges and Folds Using Darkfield Hyperspectral Microscopy by Sungmin Bong (14013295)

    Published 2024
    “…The optical characteristics of one-dimensional (1D) MoS<sub>2</sub> edges and folds at the grain level, acting as interfaces in diverse optoelectronic applications, remain unexplored in contrast to the basal plane. …”
  6. 266
  7. 267
  8. 268
  9. 269
  10. 270
  11. 271
  12. 272
  13. 273
  14. 274
  15. 275

    OS correlation of differentially expressed miRNAs (> 2-fold increase or decrease in HCC vs normal livers), according to KMP; miRNAs in bold are significantly correlated with OS. by Kayleigh Smith (17816667)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>OS correlation of differentially expressed miRNAs (> 2-fold increase or decrease in HCC vs normal livers), according to KMP; miRNAs in bold are significantly correlated with OS.…”
  16. 276
  17. 277
  18. 278
  19. 279
  20. 280

    The peak energies of the fits of individual measured V Kβ spectra by C T Chantler (557430)

    Published 2013
    “…The peak energy of the titanium Kβ spectral profile is found to be 4931.966 ± 0.022 eV prior to instrumental broadening. This 4.5 ppm result decreases the uncertainty over the past literature by a factor of 2.6 and is 2.4 standard deviations from the previous standard. …”