Search alternatives:
ppm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), pa decreased (Expand Search), 026 decrease (Expand Search)
ann decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
_ ann » _ any (Expand Search), _ anc (Expand Search)
3 nn » 3 non (Expand Search), 3 n (Expand Search), 3 nm (Expand Search)
ppm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), pa decreased (Expand Search), 026 decrease (Expand Search)
ann decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
_ ann » _ any (Expand Search), _ anc (Expand Search)
3 nn » 3 non (Expand Search), 3 n (Expand Search), 3 nm (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
Evaluating the Potential of Ozone Microbubbles for Inactivation of Tulane Virus, a Human Norovirus Surrogate
Published 2024“…After 2, 10, and 20 min postgeneration, the ozone concentration of microbubbles naturally decreased from 4 ppm to 3.2 ± 0.2, 2.26 ± 0.19, and 1.49 ± 0.23 ppm and resulted in 1.43 ± 0.44, 0.88 ± 0.5, and 0.68 ± 0.53 log<sub>10</sub> viral reductions, respectively, while the ozone concentration of aqueous ozone decreased from 4 ppm to 2.52 ± 0.07, 0.43 ± 0.05, and 0.09 ± 0.01 ppm and produced 0.8 ± 0.28, 0.29 ± 0.41, and 0.16 ± 0.21 log<sub>10</sub> reductions against Tulane virus, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.0526), suggesting that structuring of ozone in the bubbles over the applied treatment conditions did not have a significant effect, though future study with continuous generation of ozone microbubbles is needed.…”