Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
ppm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), pa decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
ppm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), pa decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
64761
Table_1_Trends of serum 25(OH) vitamin D and association with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: from NHANES survey cycles 2001–2018.docx
Published 2024“…<sup>1</sup></p>Results<p>Survey data from 2001 to 2018 revealed a rise in serum 25(OH)D levels, from a weighted mean (95% CI) of 65.6 (63.8–67.4) nmol/L during 2001–2002 to 73.5 (70.4–76.5) nmol/L during 2017–2018, among US adults, while overall vitamin D deficiency rates remained stable (p = 0.152). …”
-
64762
Table_8_Trends of serum 25(OH) vitamin D and association with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: from NHANES survey cycles 2001–2018.docx
Published 2024“…<sup>1</sup></p>Results<p>Survey data from 2001 to 2018 revealed a rise in serum 25(OH)D levels, from a weighted mean (95% CI) of 65.6 (63.8–67.4) nmol/L during 2001–2002 to 73.5 (70.4–76.5) nmol/L during 2017–2018, among US adults, while overall vitamin D deficiency rates remained stable (p = 0.152). …”
-
64763
Table_9_Trends of serum 25(OH) vitamin D and association with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: from NHANES survey cycles 2001–2018.docx
Published 2024“…<sup>1</sup></p>Results<p>Survey data from 2001 to 2018 revealed a rise in serum 25(OH)D levels, from a weighted mean (95% CI) of 65.6 (63.8–67.4) nmol/L during 2001–2002 to 73.5 (70.4–76.5) nmol/L during 2017–2018, among US adults, while overall vitamin D deficiency rates remained stable (p = 0.152). …”
-
64764
Table_4_Trends of serum 25(OH) vitamin D and association with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: from NHANES survey cycles 2001–2018.docx
Published 2024“…<sup>1</sup></p>Results<p>Survey data from 2001 to 2018 revealed a rise in serum 25(OH)D levels, from a weighted mean (95% CI) of 65.6 (63.8–67.4) nmol/L during 2001–2002 to 73.5 (70.4–76.5) nmol/L during 2017–2018, among US adults, while overall vitamin D deficiency rates remained stable (p = 0.152). …”
-
64765
Table_7_Trends of serum 25(OH) vitamin D and association with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: from NHANES survey cycles 2001–2018.docx
Published 2024“…<sup>1</sup></p>Results<p>Survey data from 2001 to 2018 revealed a rise in serum 25(OH)D levels, from a weighted mean (95% CI) of 65.6 (63.8–67.4) nmol/L during 2001–2002 to 73.5 (70.4–76.5) nmol/L during 2017–2018, among US adults, while overall vitamin D deficiency rates remained stable (p = 0.152). …”
-
64766
Table_13_Trends of serum 25(OH) vitamin D and association with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: from NHANES survey cycles 2001–2018.docx
Published 2024“…<sup>1</sup></p>Results<p>Survey data from 2001 to 2018 revealed a rise in serum 25(OH)D levels, from a weighted mean (95% CI) of 65.6 (63.8–67.4) nmol/L during 2001–2002 to 73.5 (70.4–76.5) nmol/L during 2017–2018, among US adults, while overall vitamin D deficiency rates remained stable (p = 0.152). …”
-
64767
Table_10_Trends of serum 25(OH) vitamin D and association with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: from NHANES survey cycles 2001–2018.docx
Published 2024“…<sup>1</sup></p>Results<p>Survey data from 2001 to 2018 revealed a rise in serum 25(OH)D levels, from a weighted mean (95% CI) of 65.6 (63.8–67.4) nmol/L during 2001–2002 to 73.5 (70.4–76.5) nmol/L during 2017–2018, among US adults, while overall vitamin D deficiency rates remained stable (p = 0.152). …”
-
64768
Table_6_Trends of serum 25(OH) vitamin D and association with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: from NHANES survey cycles 2001–2018.docx
Published 2024“…<sup>1</sup></p>Results<p>Survey data from 2001 to 2018 revealed a rise in serum 25(OH)D levels, from a weighted mean (95% CI) of 65.6 (63.8–67.4) nmol/L during 2001–2002 to 73.5 (70.4–76.5) nmol/L during 2017–2018, among US adults, while overall vitamin D deficiency rates remained stable (p = 0.152). …”
-
64769
Table_2_Trends of serum 25(OH) vitamin D and association with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: from NHANES survey cycles 2001–2018.docx
Published 2024“…<sup>1</sup></p>Results<p>Survey data from 2001 to 2018 revealed a rise in serum 25(OH)D levels, from a weighted mean (95% CI) of 65.6 (63.8–67.4) nmol/L during 2001–2002 to 73.5 (70.4–76.5) nmol/L during 2017–2018, among US adults, while overall vitamin D deficiency rates remained stable (p = 0.152). …”
-
64770
Table_3_Trends of serum 25(OH) vitamin D and association with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: from NHANES survey cycles 2001–2018.docx
Published 2024“…<sup>1</sup></p>Results<p>Survey data from 2001 to 2018 revealed a rise in serum 25(OH)D levels, from a weighted mean (95% CI) of 65.6 (63.8–67.4) nmol/L during 2001–2002 to 73.5 (70.4–76.5) nmol/L during 2017–2018, among US adults, while overall vitamin D deficiency rates remained stable (p = 0.152). …”
-
64771
Table_11_Trends of serum 25(OH) vitamin D and association with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: from NHANES survey cycles 2001–2018.docx
Published 2024“…<sup>1</sup></p>Results<p>Survey data from 2001 to 2018 revealed a rise in serum 25(OH)D levels, from a weighted mean (95% CI) of 65.6 (63.8–67.4) nmol/L during 2001–2002 to 73.5 (70.4–76.5) nmol/L during 2017–2018, among US adults, while overall vitamin D deficiency rates remained stable (p = 0.152). …”
-
64772
DataSheet_1_Biomarkers of postharvest resilience: unveiling the role of abscisic acid in table grapes during cold storage.docx
Published 2023“…‘Krissy’ were subjected to i) control (untreated); and ii) 1-MCP (1 µL L<sup>-1</sup>; 12 hours; 15°C) and stored under two scenarios: i) 15 days at 0.5°C, followed by five days at 5.5°C to simulate shelf-life; and ii) 20 days at 5.5°C to simulate a higher storage temperature followed by shelf-life. …”
-
64773
Gemcitabine and ATR inhibitor synergism and effects on the cell cycle and DNA damage in U-CHCF365 and UM-Chor1 (Batch 1)
Published 2024“…U-CHCF365 and UM-Chor1 cells were plated in a black walled, glass bottom, 96-well plate at 5,000 cells/well and 1,500 cells/well, respectively. …”
-
64774
Data_Sheet_1_Soil Application of Almond Residue Biomass Following Black Soldier Fly Larvae Cultivation.docx
Published 2021“…Under aerobic conditions, SPH addition increased the CO<sub>2</sub>-accumulation by a factor of 5–6 compared to the non-amended soils in SL and CL, respectively. …”
-
64775
Protocol: Temporary Pacemaker Verification and Troubleshooting
Published 2022“…<p>(Figure 1)</p> <p>(Figure 2)</p> <p><strong>Determining the Stimulation Threshold</strong></p> <ul> <li>NOTE: a paced rhythm must be present and patient stable</li> <li>From 100% pacing, gradually decrease output for A or V, while watching monitor until you lose capture</li> <li>Now gradually increase output until 1:1 capture returns – this is the stimulation threshold</li> <li>This is the lowest amount of energy that will reliably capture the heart and pace</li> <li>Set mA 1.5-3 times above this threshold value for safety</li> <li>Repeat for other circuit (A or V)</li> <li>Note: the stimulation threshold should be checked DAILY by the MD/NP when pacing is in use; in the event the threshold value is rising, discuss with surgeon to determine if alternative pacing system is needed</li> </ul> <p><strong>Determining the Sensing Threshold</strong></p> <ul> <li>Note: the patient must have an underlying rhythm and tolerate a brief period without pacing to perform</li> <li>Set RATE at least 10 bpm below patient’s intrinsic heart rate (to allow sensing)</li> <li>Set OUTPUT at 0.1 mA (to avoid competitive pacing when device is made asynchronous briefly)</li> <li>Highlight SENSITIVITY (under Menu 1)</li> <li>Decrease SENSITIVITY: Slowly turn dial counter-clockwise until pace indicator flashes regularly (asynchronously)</li> <li>Increase SENSITIVITY: Slowly turn dial clockwise until sense indicator flashes again (when sensing resumes, this is the sensing threshold – the smallest complex that is reliably recognized, thus inhibiting the device)</li> <li>Set SENSITIVITY < half this threshold value for safety</li> <li>Repeat for other circuit (A or V)</li> <li>Restore previous rate and output values</li> </ul> <p><strong>Rapid Atrial (Overdrive) Pacing – PERFORMED BY MD/NP/CNS ONLY</strong></p> <ul> <li>Used to “overdrive pace” and terminate some atrial reentrant tachyarrhythmias, especially atrial flutter</li> <li>ALWAYS VERIFY correct wire connections to avoid stimulating the ventricles at a rapid rate!…”
-
64776
Susceptibility to HIV-1 infection in primary macrophages depends on differentiation stimuli.
Published 2016“…<p><b>(A)</b> Evaluation of cell proliferation by Ki67 staining. …”
-
64777
Functional study of moDC maturation.
Published 2014“…<b>B</b>, moDCs stimulated with <i>T. whipplei</i> (a), <i>B. abortus</i> (b), <i>C. burnetii</i> (c), <i>O. tsutsugamushi</i> (d) or <i>E. coli</i> LPS (e) were co-cultured with CFSE-labeled autologous T-lymphocytes for 5 days. …”
-
64778
Thapsigargin-induced differentiation is associated with increased KGFR expression.
Published 2013“…<p>(A) HaCaT cells were treated with TG 0.5 µM for 1 h at 37°C following by incubation at 37°C for 48 h. …”
-
64779
Administration of CORM-2 does not improve m-RCT in vivo in diabetic mice.
Published 2018“…In all panels, results are the mean ± SEM of 5 mice and are expressed in % vs. injected dose. …”
-
64780
Evaluation of cesarean delivery rates in different levels of hospitals in Jiangsu Province, China, using the 10-Group classification system
Published 2021“…In non-referral hospitals, CD rate in Group 5 and the proportion of Group 5 to the overall population were also significantly higher than those in referral hospitals (98.5% vs. 92.5%, <i>p</i> < .001; and 21.0% vs. 14.5%, <i>p</i> < .001).…”