Search alternatives:
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
ppm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), pa decreased (Expand Search), 026 decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
ppm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), pa decreased (Expand Search), 026 decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
881
-
882
-
883
-
884
-
885
The energy shift from Bragg's law predicted by Mosplate, including peak and profile shifts as used in the computation, with an estimated uncertainty of 1.5 ppm
Published 2013“…The peak energy of the titanium Kβ spectral profile is found to be 4931.966 ± 0.022 eV prior to instrumental broadening. This 4.5 ppm result decreases the uncertainty over the past literature by a factor of 2.6 and is 2.4 standard deviations from the previous standard. …”
-
886
-
887
-
888
-
889
-
890
-
891
-
892
-
893
Ethanol withdrawal (EW) decreases GluN2A subunit levels.
Published 2013“…<p>NMDA subunit protein levels measured by Western blot analysis: GluN2A levels (B) decrease during ethanol withdrawal, whereas the levels of GluN1 (A) and GluN2B (C) remain unaltered. …”
-
894
-
895
-
896
-
897
-
898
-
899
-
900
Image_2_Serum Zinc-α2-Glycoprotein Levels Were Decreased in Patients With Premature Coronary Artery Disease.JPEG
Published 2019“…At the cutoff value of 7.955 μg/mL serum ZAG, the sensitivity and specificity for differentiating patients with PCAD from controls were 50.5 and 78.0%, respectively. The combination of ZAG with other clinical variables including age, gender, BMI, SBP, FBG, TC, HDL-C, Cr, and Urea had significantly improved the diagnosis accuracy with a sensitivity of 82.6%, a specificity of 95.0%, and AUC of 0.957 (95% CI, 0.940–0.975, p < 0.05).…”