Showing 641 - 660 results of 114,438 for search '(( 5 ((ppm decrease) OR (a decrease)) ) OR ( a ((non decrease) OR (nn decrease)) ))', query time: 1.53s Refine Results
  1. 641
  2. 642

    Time course of central retinal thickness (CRT) in recurrence and non-recurrence groups. by Yasuyuki Sotani (20114144)

    Published 2025
    “…These values significantly decreased in the first postoperative year to 2.3 ± 2.6, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.6, 0, and 3.1 ± 2.8; in the second year to 2.1 ± 2.8, 0.4 ± 1.0, 0.0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.6 ± 2.8; and in the third year to 2.0 ± 2.2, 0, 0.6 ± 1.7, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.8 ± 3.5 (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.001; <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0332941#pone.0332941.g007" target="_blank">Fig 7</a>). …”
  3. 643
  4. 644
  5. 645
  6. 646
  7. 647
  8. 648
  9. 649
  10. 650
  11. 651
  12. 652
  13. 653
  14. 654
  15. 655
  16. 656

    Comparison of potential energy minimization curves of hypothetical monomer chains from non-capsid and capsid dimers. by Weimin Wu (505435)

    Published 2020
    “…<p>Compared are apo 3KXS (A) and liganded 5E0I (B) non-capsid chains with the apo T = 4 1QGT capsid chains (C). …”
  17. 657
  18. 658
  19. 659

    Prolonged starvation leads to a delay in cell cycle re-entry and decrease in H3K27ac in Vasa2+/Piwi1+ cells. by Eudald Pascual-Carreras (12115380)

    Published 2025
    “…Significance levels after one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD for pairwise comparisons are indicated for adjusted <i>p</i> values: *<i>p < </i>0.05, **<i>p < </i>0.01; ****<i>p < </i>0.0001. d: day(s), n.s.: non-significant. See <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003525#pbio.3003525.s016" target="_blank">S5</a> and <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003525#pbio.3003525.s017" target="_blank">S6 Tables</a> for mean values and statistical data and <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003525#pbio.3003525.s020" target="_blank">S1 Data</a> for individual numerical values.…”
  20. 660