Search alternatives:
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
ppm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), pa decreased (Expand Search), 026 decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 step » _ step (Expand Search), a step (Expand Search), 2 step (Expand Search)
50 a » 50 μ (Expand Search), 50 _ (Expand Search), 50 c (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
ppm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), pa decreased (Expand Search), 026 decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 step » _ step (Expand Search), a step (Expand Search), 2 step (Expand Search)
50 a » 50 μ (Expand Search), 50 _ (Expand Search), 50 c (Expand Search)
-
221
-
222
-
223
-
224
-
225
-
226
-
227
-
228
-
229
-
230
Relative change in catch for the last 20 years of projection for 50% increase in fishing effort of crustaceans (ICRUS50%), a 50% increase in fishing effort for crustaceans and finf...
Published 2019“…Note that the y-axes is the ratio of change against the starting conditions—so a -0.5 result indicates a 50% decrease and a 0.5 result indicates a 50% increase -.…”
-
231
-
232
Evaluating the Potential of Ozone Microbubbles for Inactivation of Tulane Virus, a Human Norovirus Surrogate
Published 2024“…After 2, 10, and 20 min postgeneration, the ozone concentration of microbubbles naturally decreased from 4 ppm to 3.2 ± 0.2, 2.26 ± 0.19, and 1.49 ± 0.23 ppm and resulted in 1.43 ± 0.44, 0.88 ± 0.5, and 0.68 ± 0.53 log<sub>10</sub> viral reductions, respectively, while the ozone concentration of aqueous ozone decreased from 4 ppm to 2.52 ± 0.07, 0.43 ± 0.05, and 0.09 ± 0.01 ppm and produced 0.8 ± 0.28, 0.29 ± 0.41, and 0.16 ± 0.21 log<sub>10</sub> reductions against Tulane virus, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.0526), suggesting that structuring of ozone in the bubbles over the applied treatment conditions did not have a significant effect, though future study with continuous generation of ozone microbubbles is needed.…”
-
233
-
234
-
235
-
236
-
237
-
238
-
239
-
240