Search alternatives:
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1441
The search strategy in three databases.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
1442
A summary of the included study characteristics.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
1443
NIH score.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
1444
List of excluded studies.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
1445
-
1446
-
1447
-
1448
Top five most important primary nodes ranked among different indicators in the FFN.
Published 2022Subjects: -
1449
-
1450
-
1451
S100A9: A Potential Biomarker for the Progression of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and the Diagnosis of Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis
Published 2015“…We find that gene expression of s100a9 was higher in NAFL group compared with control, and was increased in NASH groups and decreased in NAFL + T2DM group compared with NAFL. …”
-
1452
-
1453
-
1454
Adjustment step size.
Published 2025“…Integration efficiency increases by 18.7%, and computational complexity is significantly reduced, with average computation time decreased by 15.4%. User satisfaction also improves, with a 19.5% increase in experience ratings. …”
-
1455
-
1456
-
1457
-
1458
-
1459
-
1460
Effects of siRNA TMPRSS2-ERG on ERG protein expression and cell viability.
Published 2015“…The number of viable cells was measured and 100% cell viability corresponds to the number of living cells incubated only with transfecting agent. *** = <i>p</i><0.001, significant decrease compared to untreated cells or to siRNA Control (Kruskal & Wallis followed by Tukey and Dunnet test).…”