EZH2 Is Associated with Malignant Behavior in Pancreatic IPMN via p27^Kip1 Downregulation by Hideyuki Kuroki (607412)

“…</p><p>Methods</p><p>Fifty-four surgically resected pancreatic IPMN specimens, including a total of 181 lesions (normal duct in 48, adenoma in 50, borderline atypia in 53, carcinoma in situ (CIS) in 19, and invasive carcinoma in 11) were analyzed by immunohistochemical staining (EZH2, Ki-67, p27^Kip1). …”

Quantification of Cre recombinase efficiency. by Rosa-Eva Huettl (113537)

“…Quantification (J) shows a 2-fold decrease in the numbers of <i>Npn-1</i> expressing sensory neurons (positive for Isl-1) in mutant embryos to 10.4%±0.8% at brachial and 13.5%±0.4% at lumbar levels (<i>n</i> = 3, <i>p</i>^brachial<0.005; <i>p</i>^lumbar<0.0005). …”

Table_1_Sodium-Related Adaptations to Drought: New Insights From the Xerophyte Plant Zygophyllum xanthoxylum.DOCX by Jie-Jun Xi (5989541)

“…The results of this study demonstrate that Z. xanthoxylum has evolved a notable ability to utilize Na⁺ ions to lower Ψ_s, swell its leaves, and decrease stomatal aperture sizes, in order to enable the additional uptake and storage of water and mitigate losses. …”

Data_Sheet_1_Cerebrovascular Reactivity Assays Collateral Function in Carotid Stenosis.docx by Olivia Sobczyk (5412599)

“…Ipsilateral MCA territory CVR was less than normal in each class, including that with <50% stenosis (Student t-test, two-tailed; p = 0.0014 for GM and p = 0.030 for WM), with a trend of decreasing average CVR with increasing stenosis. …”

Image_4_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.PNG by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Image_3_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.PNG by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Table_1_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.pdf by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Image_7_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.PNG by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Image_1_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.PNG by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Image_2_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.PNG by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Audio_3_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.WAV by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Image_6_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.PNG by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Audio_1_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.WAV by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Audio_2_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.WAV by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Video_1_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.WMV by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Measurements of time in acupuncture manipulation techniques. by In-Seon Lee (483585)

“…<p>(a) Rotation; (+): Thumb forward (TF); (-): Thumb backward (TB); TF time error = |0.5 s—TF time|, mean ± SE; TB time error = |0.5 s—TB time|, mean ± SE; Target ratio of time = TF time/TB time = 1:1. …”

Table_1_Monitoring the Neurotransmitter Response to Glycemic Changes Using an Advanced Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Protocol at 7T.DOCX by Young Woo Park (8349177)

“…Data were acquired with a semi-LASER sequence [repetition time/echo time (TR/TE) = 5,000/26 ms] from volumes of interest (VOIs) in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and hypothalamus (HTL). …”

mTORC1 promotes proliferation of preosteoblasts but prevents their maturation. by Bin Huang (331329)

“…All data are mean ± SD (n = 5 mice), scale bars represent 50 μm for (A), (C), (E), (G) and 100 μm for (I). …”

Distribution of Small RNA-Generating Loci from Each Chromosome by Kristin D Kasschau (2735)

“…<div><p>(A) Scrolling-window analysis (50,000-nt window and 10,000-nt scroll) of small RNA loci. …”

Inhibition of EGFR-Grb2 interaction by the small tyrosine kinase inhibitor AG1478. by Peter Lanzerstorfer (540769)

“…(B) Time course of the Grb2 contrast change upon EGF stimulation in control and AG1478 pretreated (1, 10 μM) cells (n = 50). Pretreatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor leads to a decreased contrast compared to untreated cells. …”