Search alternatives:
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
19861
-
19862
Table_1_The gut microbiota as a potential biomarker for methamphetamine use disorder: evidence from two independent datasets.docx
Published 2023“…Based on these microbial features, we developed a machine learning model to help identify MUD patients. …”
-
19863
-
19864
-
19865
VisAccel complete data_redacted2.xlsx
Published 2025“…When the velocity profile of the visual stimulus matched the velocity profile of inertial motion, the inertial stimulus was biased 10.0 ± 1.8° (mean ± SE) with a 45° visual offset, 8.9 ± 1.7° with a 60° offset, and 9.3° ± 2.5 ± with a 75° offset. …”
-
19866
Image_3_Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Preoperative Embolization for Intracranial Giant Meningioma Tumorectomy: A Retrospective, Observational, Matched Cohort Study.tif
Published 2022“…</p>Results<p>Sixty-six cases in each group were included in our study after being matched. We did not find any significant differences of estimated blood loss (600.00 (400) vs. 500.00 (500.00) ml, p = 0.31), decrease of HGB level (30.81 ± 15.82 vs. 26.59 ± 12.90 g/L, p = 0.09), gross total resection rate (74.24% vs. 77.27%, p = 0.68), surgical time (302.50 (136) vs. 300.00 (72) min, p = 0.48), blood transfusion rates (53.03% vs. 42.42%, p = 0.35), blood transfusion volume [650.00 (657.50) vs. 535.00 (875.00) ml, p = 0.63] between the embolization group and nonembolization group. …”
-
19867
Image_1_Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Preoperative Embolization for Intracranial Giant Meningioma Tumorectomy: A Retrospective, Observational, Matched Cohort Study.tif
Published 2022“…</p>Results<p>Sixty-six cases in each group were included in our study after being matched. We did not find any significant differences of estimated blood loss (600.00 (400) vs. 500.00 (500.00) ml, p = 0.31), decrease of HGB level (30.81 ± 15.82 vs. 26.59 ± 12.90 g/L, p = 0.09), gross total resection rate (74.24% vs. 77.27%, p = 0.68), surgical time (302.50 (136) vs. 300.00 (72) min, p = 0.48), blood transfusion rates (53.03% vs. 42.42%, p = 0.35), blood transfusion volume [650.00 (657.50) vs. 535.00 (875.00) ml, p = 0.63] between the embolization group and nonembolization group. …”
-
19868
Image_2_Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Preoperative Embolization for Intracranial Giant Meningioma Tumorectomy: A Retrospective, Observational, Matched Cohort Study.tif
Published 2022“…</p>Results<p>Sixty-six cases in each group were included in our study after being matched. We did not find any significant differences of estimated blood loss (600.00 (400) vs. 500.00 (500.00) ml, p = 0.31), decrease of HGB level (30.81 ± 15.82 vs. 26.59 ± 12.90 g/L, p = 0.09), gross total resection rate (74.24% vs. 77.27%, p = 0.68), surgical time (302.50 (136) vs. 300.00 (72) min, p = 0.48), blood transfusion rates (53.03% vs. 42.42%, p = 0.35), blood transfusion volume [650.00 (657.50) vs. 535.00 (875.00) ml, p = 0.63] between the embolization group and nonembolization group. …”
-
19869
Table_1_Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Preoperative Embolization for Intracranial Giant Meningioma Tumorectomy: A Retrospective, Observational, Matched Cohort Study.docx
Published 2022“…</p>Results<p>Sixty-six cases in each group were included in our study after being matched. We did not find any significant differences of estimated blood loss (600.00 (400) vs. 500.00 (500.00) ml, p = 0.31), decrease of HGB level (30.81 ± 15.82 vs. 26.59 ± 12.90 g/L, p = 0.09), gross total resection rate (74.24% vs. 77.27%, p = 0.68), surgical time (302.50 (136) vs. 300.00 (72) min, p = 0.48), blood transfusion rates (53.03% vs. 42.42%, p = 0.35), blood transfusion volume [650.00 (657.50) vs. 535.00 (875.00) ml, p = 0.63] between the embolization group and nonembolization group. …”
-
19870
-
19871
-
19872
Supplementary Material for: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Molecular Biomarkers Associated with Early Neurological Deterioration Following Acute Stroke
Published 2018“…After classification into 3 broad categories, meta-analysis showed that biomarkers associated with increased END risk (n; fixed-effects mean difference; 95% CI) were “metabolic” (glucose [<i>n</i> = 9,481; 0.90 mmol/L; 0.74–1.06], glycosylated haemoglobin [<i>n</i> = 3,146; 0.33%; 0.19–0.46], low-density lipoprotein [<i>n</i> = 4,839; 0.13 mmol/L; 0.06–0.21], total cholesterol [<i>n</i> = 4,762; 0.21 mmol/L; 0.11–0.31], triglycerides [<i>n</i> = 4,820; 0.11 mmol/L; 0.06–0.17], urea [<i>n</i> = 1,351; 0.55 mmol/L; 0.14–0.96], decreasing albumin [<i>n</i> = 513; 0.33 g/dL; 0.05–0.61]); “inflammatory and excitotoxic” (plasma glutamate [<i>n</i> = 688; 60.13 µmol/L; 50.04–70.22], CSF glutamate [<i>n</i> = 369; 7.50 µmol/L; 6.76–8.23], homocysteine [<i>n</i> = 824; 2.15 µmol/L; 0.68–3.61], leucocytes [<i>n</i> = 3,766; 0.54 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L; 0.34–0.74], high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [<i>n</i> = 1,707; 3.79 mg/L; 1.23–6.35]); and “coagulation/haematological” (fibrinogen [<i>n</i> = 3,132; 0.32 g/L; 0.25–0.40]; decreasing haemoglobin [<i>n</i> = 3,586; 2.38 g/L; 0.15–4.60]). …”
-
19873
-
19874
-
19875
-
19876
-
19877
-
19878
-
19879
-
19880