Showing 361 - 380 results of 105,537 for search '(( 5 ((teer decrease) OR (a decrease)) ) OR ( 50 ((we decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ))', query time: 1.45s Refine Results
  1. 361
  2. 362
  3. 363
  4. 364
  5. 365
  6. 366
  7. 367

    Inclusion of TPP side chains result in decreased melanoma cell mitochondria membrane potential, oxygen consumption, and increased DHE oxidation. by Kyle C. Kloepping (9928265)

    Published 2020
    “…At the 25 min mark, 1.0 μM 12-TPP was added to treatment A375 cells followed by the sequential addition of 2.5 μM oligomycin at the 60 min mark, 0.3 μM oligomycin at the 90 min mark, and 5.0 μM rotenone/antimycin A at the 120 min mark. …”
  8. 368
  9. 369

    Downregulation of DOM decreases the abundance of PER and TIM. by Zhenxing Liu (399809)

    Published 2019
    “…Downregulation of DOM decreased PER levels at CT1-5 and CT17-21. (Scale bar: 50 um.) …”
  10. 370

    A decrease in the invasiveness of <i>Candida albicans</i> into Caco-2 cells parallels the differentiation of intestinal epithelial cells. by Marianne Goyer (2550589)

    Published 2016
    “…Caco-2 cell differentiation increased throughout the culture as highlighted by the increase in TEER measurements (Ω.cm<sup>2</sup>) (full line), which correlated with a decrease in <i>C</i>. …”
  11. 371
  12. 372

    There is a significant decrease in fibroblast, α-SMA, and Ly6C staining accompanied with a decrease in proliferation, and increase in cell death in the outflow vein removed <i>Iex-... by Akshaar Brahmbhatt (551498)

    Published 2014
    “…</b> Pooled data from the semiquantitative analysis for intensity of Fsp-1 staining in the vessel wall of the outflow vein specimens removed from <i>Iex-1</i> KO and WT mice. There is a significant decrease in the mean Fsp-1 staining in the <i>Iex-1</i> KO animals when compared to WT controls (P<0.05). …”
  13. 373
  14. 374
  15. 375
  16. 376
  17. 377

    S1 File - by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

    Published 2024
    “…Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”
  18. 378

    Detailed information on field experiments. by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

    Published 2024
    “…Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”
  19. 379

    List of symbols used in this study. by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

    Published 2024
    “…Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”
  20. 380

    Data sources for calibration and evaluation. by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

    Published 2024
    “…Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”