Showing 841 - 860 results of 36,980 for search '(( 5 ((teer decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ) OR ( 100 ((we decrease) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 0.98s Refine Results
  1. 841

    C.<sub>-100~-110</sub> caused a decrease in the promoter activity but the WT sequence of 11bp is neither an E-box nor a MEF2C binding site. by Jie Chen (5892)

    Published 2015
    “…<sub>-100~-110</sub> (<i>x</i>) demonstrated a decreased luciferase activity for about 30% as compared to each WT counterparts. …”
  2. 842
  3. 843
  4. 844
  5. 845
  6. 846
  7. 847

    Analysis of the <sup>1</sup> H–<sup>15</sup>N HSQC spectrum of the RAGE V domain with unlabeled S100A1. by Md. Imran Khan (4853302)

    Published 2018
    “…Cross-peaks displaying significantly decreased intensity are shown in green boxes.</p> <p>(B) Bar graph analysis representing the intensity change (I/I<sub>0</sub>) of cross-peaks of <sup>15</sup>N V domain to <sup>15</sup>N V domain complex with S100A1 versus residue numbers of RAGE V domain (24–128). …”
  8. 848

    Analysis of the <sup>1</sup>H–<sup>15</sup>N HSQC spectra of S100A1 in complex with the unlabeled RAGE V domain. by Md. Imran Khan (4853302)

    Published 2018
    “…</p> <p>(D) Ribbon representing the structure of homo-dimer. The monomers of S100A1 homodimer are colored in green and blue.</p> <p>(E) A monomer of S100A1 and residues that exhibit significantly decreasing cross-peak signals are mapped on the structure in magenta.…”
  9. 849

    Oscillatory Dynamics Supporting Semantic Cognition: MEG Evidence for the Contribution of the Anterior Temporal Lobe Hub and Modality-Specific Spokes by Giovanna Mollo (3633013)

    Published 2017
    “…In ATL, there were two phases of response: from around 100 ms post-stimulus there were phasic bursts of low gamma activity resulting in <i>reductions</i> in oscillatory power, relative to a baseline period, that were modulated by both category and specificity; this was followed by more sustained power decreases across frequency bands from 250 ms onwards. …”
  10. 850
  11. 851
  12. 852
  13. 853
  14. 854
  15. 855

    Individual data and box plots on ∑PBB of all samples. by Matti Viluksela (321291)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>Individual data (A) indicate an increase in the early 1980’s, a peak in mid-late 1990’s followed by a decrease depending on study area. ∑PBB means (x), medians (horizontal line), interquartile ranges, min and max data points excluding outliers (exceeding 1.5 times the interquartile range; bars) and individual values of all samples (1972–2005) in different study areas (B). …”
  16. 856
  17. 857
  18. 858

    Individual data and box plots on ∑TEQs of all samples. by Matti Viluksela (321291)

    Published 2024
    “…PCDD/F TEQ + PCB TEQ means (x), medians (horizontal line), interquartile ranges, min and max data points excluding outliers (exceeding 1.5 times the interquartile range; bars) and individual values of all samples (1972–2017) in different study areas (B). …”
  19. 859

    Individual data and box plots on ∑PCB and PCB TEQs of all samples. by Matti Viluksela (321291)

    Published 2024
    “…In right panel ∑PCB (B) and PCB TEQ (D) means (x), medians (horizontal line), interquartile ranges, min and max datapoints excluding outliers (exceeding 1.5 times the interquartile range; bars) and individual values of all samples (1972–2017) in different study areas are shown. …”
  20. 860

    Individual data and box plots on ∑PCDD/F and PCDD/F-TEQs of all samples. by Matti Viluksela (321291)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>In left panel ∑PCDD/F (A) and PCDD/F TEQ (C) show decreasing trends since 1980’s-1990’s until 2010. In right panel ∑PCDD/F (B) and PCDD/F TEQ (D) means (x), medians (horizontal line), interquartile ranges, min and max datapoints excluding outliers (exceeding 1.5 times the interquartile range; bars) and individual values of all samples (1972–2017) in different study areas are shown. …”