Determinants of study power. by Leticia M. Nogueira (501430)

“…<p><b>A</b>. Study power decreases with increasing sample storage time (▪0 years, ▴ 5 years, •10 years). …”

Global peripheral leukocyte DNA methylation levels in subjects. by Anna Crescenti (427339)

“…Methylcytosine levels (5mC), measured as percentage of total cytosine, were determined by HPLC. …”

Inhibition of CFTR activity by fractions from Chinese wild grapevine. by Yaofang Zhang (112836)

“…Percentage inhibition rate of the positive fractions indicating Gaussian distributions of the positive clusters. C. Activity of positive fractions. Dose-response results showing inhibition of cocktail-stimulated (5 μM forskolin, 100 μM IBMX and 25 μM genistein) I⁻ influx by fraction 51 (left) and fraction 55 (right) at indicated concentrations. …”

Fluorescence emission of human plasminogen (325 nm excitation). by Manuel Correia (113666)

“…The experimental points were fitted to an exponential function <i>F(t)</i> = <i>C</i>1– <i>C</i>2.e^-<i>kt</i>. Fitted parameter values and corresponding errors, and root mean square error values were obtained after fitting the kinetic trace (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0116737#pone.0116737.t005" target="_blank">Table 5</a>).…”

Occupancy of PRC1 and PRC2 at Rest peaks in <i>Wt</i> and <i>Rest</i>−/− mES cells. by Nikolaj Dietrich (181521)

“…P-values were calculated by comparing the number of Rest binding sites with 1.5 fold increase or decrease to those expected from a population with similar distribution as the matched control using chi²-tests (C) ChIP-seq profiles for the positions marked 1 to 6 in <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002494#pgen-1002494-g004" target="_blank">Figure 4B</a> as examples. …”

Differential gene expression in bovine endometrial epithelial cells treated with IFNT2 or IFNTc1. by Kazuya Kusama (768185)

“…<p>(A) Venn diagram shows the number of gene with 1.5-fold changes among Control (Ctrl), IFNT2, and IFNTc1 treatment groups, and right table lists increased or decreased genes in IFNT2 vs. …”

Effect of PKC on high glucose induced TLR4 expression. by Jianping Peng (3478610)

“…<p>RPTC were treated for 24 hours with low glucose (5.5 mM), high glucose (30 mM), or the PKC inhibitor staurosporine (10 nM, added 1 hour before high glucose treatment), and the cell lysates were collected, TLR4 mRNA, phospho-PKC (pan), p-p38, p38 levels were examined via real-time PCR and Western blotting. …”

Fig 3 - by Abigael Eva Chaouat (11568088)

“…(C-D) Homozygous female K18-hACE2 transgenic mice were infected with SARS-CoV-2 (day 0) and treated at 1, 2, 3 DPI with 2nmol/mouse of RBD-Ig (<i>n = 10</i>) or ACE2-Ig (<i>n = 10</i>), at 5 DPI mice were sacrificed, sera was collected and lung harvested. …”

PDGF-BB-induced changes in CCSMC phenotypes. by Jun-Feng Yan (3801184)

“…<p>(A) Microscopic imaging of CCSMCs exposed to 0, 5, 10, or 20 ng/ml PDGF-BB. …”

Significant changes (P≤0.05, FC ≥2) of water soluble metabolites in N₃₃ exposed to cold. by Abdollah Ghobakhlou (503529)

“…<p>GT4 =  Growth at 4°C; T1 = 2 min, T2 = 4 min, T3 = 8 min, T4 = 60 min, T5 = 240 min exposure to 4°C of cells grown at 21°C, GT10 =  Growth at 10°C. …”

Thapsigargin-induced differentiation is associated with increased KGFR expression. by Francesca Belleudi (233982)

“…<p>(A) HaCaT cells were treated with TG 0.5 µM for 1 h at 37°C following by incubation at 37°C for 48 h. …”

Evolution of LAF1 IDR. by Simon M. Lichtinger (11326846)

“…<p><b>(A)</b> Typical GA progression for LAF1. The fitness function [<a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009328#pcbi.1009328.e005" target="_blank">Eq (2)</a>] was evaluated at , and increases by ∼30% over 9 rounds, while maintaining population diversity. …”

TF function predicted from regulatory parameters <i>α</i> and <i>β</i>. by Md Zulfikar Ali (11965544)

“…Black contours mark FC_max = 1 and subsequent contours represent 100–fold increase or decrease in FC_max. The observed regulation from a TF depends on promoter strength. …”

Combined Experimental and Computational Studies on Carbon−Carbon Reductive Elimination from Bis(hydrocarbyl) Complexes of (PCP)Ir by Rajshekhar Ghosh (1812388)

“…Thus there is no evidence for participation of the π or π* orbitals of the aryl or vinyl groups in the formation of the C−C bond, although a small π effect cannot be rigorously excluded. …”

Combined Experimental and Computational Studies on Carbon−Carbon Reductive Elimination from Bis(hydrocarbyl) Complexes of (PCP)Ir by Rajshekhar Ghosh (1812388)

“…Thus there is no evidence for participation of the π or π* orbitals of the aryl or vinyl groups in the formation of the C−C bond, although a small π effect cannot be rigorously excluded. …”

Combined Experimental and Computational Studies on Carbon−Carbon Reductive Elimination from Bis(hydrocarbyl) Complexes of (PCP)Ir by Rajshekhar Ghosh (1812388)

“…Thus there is no evidence for participation of the π or π* orbitals of the aryl or vinyl groups in the formation of the C−C bond, although a small π effect cannot be rigorously excluded. …”

Combined Experimental and Computational Studies on Carbon−Carbon Reductive Elimination from Bis(hydrocarbyl) Complexes of (PCP)Ir by Rajshekhar Ghosh (1812388)

“…Thus there is no evidence for participation of the π or π* orbitals of the aryl or vinyl groups in the formation of the C−C bond, although a small π effect cannot be rigorously excluded. …”

Combined Experimental and Computational Studies on Carbon−Carbon Reductive Elimination from Bis(hydrocarbyl) Complexes of (PCP)Ir by Rajshekhar Ghosh (1812388)

“…Thus there is no evidence for participation of the π or π* orbitals of the aryl or vinyl groups in the formation of the C−C bond, although a small π effect cannot be rigorously excluded. …”

Combined Experimental and Computational Studies on Carbon−Carbon Reductive Elimination from Bis(hydrocarbyl) Complexes of (PCP)Ir by Rajshekhar Ghosh (1812388)

“…Thus there is no evidence for participation of the π or π* orbitals of the aryl or vinyl groups in the formation of the C−C bond, although a small π effect cannot be rigorously excluded. …”

Combined Experimental and Computational Studies on Carbon−Carbon Reductive Elimination from Bis(hydrocarbyl) Complexes of (PCP)Ir by Rajshekhar Ghosh (1812388)

“…Thus there is no evidence for participation of the π or π* orbitals of the aryl or vinyl groups in the formation of the C−C bond, although a small π effect cannot be rigorously excluded. …”