Showing 100,301 - 100,320 results of 103,428 for search '(( 5 ((we decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ) OR ( 5 ((c decrease) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 2.13s Refine Results
  1. 100301

    Thymoma Resection Using Subxiphoid Uniportal Approach by Deping Zhao (6185654)

    Published 2019
    “…<a href="https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.17-00128"><em>Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg</em>. 2018;24(2):65-72</a>.…”
  2. 100302
  3. 100303
  4. 100304

    Table2_Estimating farmers’ willingness to pay for photovoltaic industry to improve agricultural green resources and environment.DOCX by Jinyang Li (683874)

    Published 2022
    “…The study used the double-bound dichotomous CVM model and C-optimal design to revise the bidding value of the payment scheme that reduced the WTP range error. …”
  5. 100305
  6. 100306
  7. 100307
  8. 100308
  9. 100309
  10. 100310

    Comparison of 1% cyclosporine eye drops in olive oil and in linseed oil to treat experimentally-induced keratoconjunctivitis sicca in rabbits by Leticia Rodrigues Parrilha (5764292)

    Published 2018
    “…The rabbits were divided into five groups: one control (C) group without KCS induction and four treatment groups in which KCS was induced and treated topically with olive oil (O), linseed oil (L), cyclosporine in olive oil (CO), and cyclosporine in linseed oil (CL). …”
  11. 100311
  12. 100312
  13. 100313
  14. 100314
  15. 100315
  16. 100316
  17. 100317
  18. 100318
  19. 100319

    Results from stepwise regression to establish the SAM<sup>2</sup> predictors that explained variance in the valence × neuroticism interaction in Studies 1-all, 2, and 3 (Fig 8). by Léo Dutriaux (3153684)

    Published 2023
    “…In the original analyses (left column), behavior regularity was regressed onto only valence and neuroticism in Model 2 from the analysis pipeline to test the valence × neuroticism interaction maximally. The five primary SAM<sup>2</sup> predictors (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0286954#pone.0286954.g001" target="_blank">Fig 1</a>) were then added one at a time into the original regression to assess how much each alone decreased the coefficient for the valence × neuroticism interaction (est<sub>V×N</sub>). …”
  20. 100320

    Results from stepwise regression to establish the SAM<sup>2</sup> predictors that explained variance in the valence × self-control interaction in Studies 1-all, 2, and 3 (Fig 7). by Léo Dutriaux (3153684)

    Published 2023
    “…In the original analyses (left column), behavior regularity was regressed onto only valence and self-control in Model 2 from the analysis pipeline to test the valence × self-control interaction maximally. The five primary SAM<sup>2</sup> predictors (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0286954#pone.0286954.g001" target="_blank">Fig 1</a>) were then added one at a time into the original regression to assess how much each alone decreased the coefficient for the valence × self-control interaction (est<sub>V×S</sub>). …”