Showing 8,401 - 8,420 results of 74,781 for search '(( 5 ((we decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ) OR ( 50 ((nn decrease) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 1.24s Refine Results
  1. 8401

    Table_5_The Advantage of Supine and Standing Heart Rate Variability Analysis to Assess Training Status and Performance in a Walking Ultramarathon.DOCX by Martina Anna Maggioni (8568585)

    Published 2020
    “…There were no significant differences in both supine and standing HRV between finishers (n = 14) and non-finishers (n = 11, mean distance 67 km). In finishers, a slower race velocity was significantly correlated with a higher decrease in parasympathetic drive during position change [larger decrease in High Frequency power normalized units (HF<sub>nu</sub>: r = −0.7, p = 0.01) and higher increase in the detrended fluctuation analysis alpha 1 index (DFA1: r = 0.6, p = 0.04)]. …”
  2. 8402
  3. 8403
  4. 8404
  5. 8405
  6. 8406

    Berberine inhibits 4-AP-induced glutamate release from rat cerebrocortical nerve terminals; this effect is due to a decrease in vesicular exocytosis. by Tzu-Yu Lin (423761)

    Published 2013
    “…DL-TBOA or bafilomycin A1 was added 20 min before depolarization, while berberine was added 10 min before depolarization. Results are mean ± SEM of 5–6 independent experiments. ***, P<0.001 versus control group; #, P<0.05 versus DL-TBOA-treated group.…”
  7. 8407
  8. 8408

    Research dataset of the study. by Faranak Mahmoudi Alami (18309967)

    Published 2024
    “…The mean erector spinae mean rmCSA was significantly greater in the clinical LSI group compared to the control group (SMD = 0.853, 95% CI = 0.105 to -1.6, P = 0.044) and also compared to the CNLBP without clinical LSI (SMD = 0.894, 95% CI = -1.645 to -0.144, P = 0.030) at the L4-L5 level.…”
  9. 8409

    Study sample characteristics by groups. by Faranak Mahmoudi Alami (18309967)

    Published 2024
    “…The mean erector spinae mean rmCSA was significantly greater in the clinical LSI group compared to the control group (SMD = 0.853, 95% CI = 0.105 to -1.6, P = 0.044) and also compared to the CNLBP without clinical LSI (SMD = 0.894, 95% CI = -1.645 to -0.144, P = 0.030) at the L4-L5 level.…”
  10. 8410
  11. 8411
  12. 8412
  13. 8413
  14. 8414
  15. 8415
  16. 8416
  17. 8417
  18. 8418
  19. 8419
  20. 8420

    Scaling of noise as a function of the mean protein level for different mechanisms. by Mohammad Soltani (463657)

    Published 2016
    “…The scaling factors are shown as a function of the protein random burst size <i>B</i>, noise in cell-cycle time () and magnitude of partitioning errors quantified by <i>α</i> (see <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004972#pcbi.1004972.e005" target="_blank">Eq (5)</a>). With increasing mean level the total noise first decreases and then reaches a baseline that corresponds to extrinsic noise. …”