Search alternatives:
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
nm decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
nm decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
961
-
962
Demethylation of HPV16 LCR CpG sites decreases E6 and E7 expression.
Published 2015“…<p>Demethylation of the CpG sites induced by 0.5 μM 5-aza-dc for 96 h decreased E6 and E7 expression, which was detected by reverse transcription PCR <b>A)</b> and quantitative real-time PCR <b>B)</b>; E6 and E7 were clearly decreased in UM-SCC47 and CaSki cells, but there was no obvious change in SiHa cells. …”
-
963
-
964
-
965
-
966
-
967
The MTT assay to determine decreases in residual cell viability in SK-N-BE2 and IMR-32 cells.
Published 2013“…As presented in the bar diagrams, combination of 50 nM LC3 shRNA plasmid and 25 µM GST in SK-N-BE2 cells while combination of 100 nM LC3 shRNA plasmid and 25 µM GST in IMR-32 cells showed the best synergistic efficacy, as determined by the combination index (CI) value, for the highest decrease in residual cell viability. …”
-
968
-
969
-
970
-
971
-
972
-
973
-
974
-
975
-
976
-
977
Colony survival is decreased in UUC-enriched deletion mutants after exposure to oxidative stress-inducing agents.
Published 2020“…In the central figure, percent survival is shown relative to untreated wt. The inset shows the magnitude of the decrease in survival (i.e., percent survival untreated minus treated conditions for individual strains). …”
-
978
-
979
Expression of pro-fibrotic genes of the TGFβ family is substantially decreased following AT1 receptor antagonism.
Published 2013“…Values are mean±SEM; n = 5, 9 and 13 for wild type and RenTg mice before and after irbesartan, respectively; * P<0,05 vs WT; <sup>#</sup> P<0,05 or <sup>##</sup> P<0,001 vs RenTg. …”
-
980