Search alternatives:
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
ng decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
ng decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
521
-
522
The incidence rate of progression from microalbuminuria to proteinuria with dulaglutide use.
Published 2022Subjects: -
523
-
524
-
525
-
526
-
527
The corticospinal pathway is more susceptible to iterative stimulation and have lower conduction velocity in <i>taiep</i> rats.
Published 2024“…<p><b>A)</b> Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by iterative electrical stimulation on the cerebral cortex showed a decrease in their amplitudes when increasing the stimulation rate from 5 to 30 Hz in <i>taiep</i> (blue squares), but not in WT rats (empty circles). …”
-
528
-
529
MiR-129-5p levels were decreased in mouse depression models.
Published 2025“…</b> Relative expression of miR-129-5p in the control and CRS groups. <b>M.</b> Relative expression of miR-129-5p in the CTX, HIP, and HB of control and CRS mice. …”
-
530
-
531
-
532
-
533
-
534
-
535
-
536
-
537
-
538
-
539
-
540
Table_1_Anti-Mitochondrial Antibody Titers Decrease Over Time in Primary Biliary Cholangitis Patients With Ursodeoxycholic Acid Therapeutic Response: A Cohort Study Followed Up to...
Published 2022“…Patients with baseline cirrhosis (2.78 ± 2.56 vs. 6.84 ± 9.00 mg/dL, p=0.024) and UDCA nonresponders (2.54 ± 2.19 vs. 4.51 ± 6.99 mg/dL, p=0.006) had increased total bilirubin levels while patients without cirrhosis (AST: 91.5 ± 84.5 vs. 58.9 ± 43.7 U/L, p<0.001; ALT: 107.3 ± 122.5 vs. 50.7 ± 36.8 U/L, p<0.001) and UDCA responders (AST: 83.8 ± 101.3 vs. 45.58 ± 38.42 U/L, p=0.014; ALT: 95.10 ± 144.6 vs. 39.12 ± 30.65 U/L, p=0.009) had decreased aminotransferase levels. …”