Showing 17,481 - 17,500 results of 46,952 for search '(( 5 ((wt decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ) OR ( 50 ((nn decrease) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 1.20s Refine Results
  1. 17481

    Effect of phyllanthus niruri on metabolic parameters of patients with kidney stone: a perspective for disease prevention by Nidia D. Pucci (5631659)

    Published 2018
    “…There were no significant changes in all periods for anthropometric and several serum measurements, including total blood count, creatinine, uric acid, sodium, potassium, calcium, urine volume and pH; a significant increase in urinary potassium from 50.5±20.4 to 56.2±21.8 mg/24-hour (p=0.017); magnesium/creatinine ratio 58±22.5 to 69.1±28.6mg/gCr24-hour (p=0.013) and potassium/creatinine ratio 39.3±15.1 to 51.3±34.7mg/gCr24-hour (p=0.008) from baseline to wash out. …”
  2. 17482
  3. 17483
  4. 17484

    Structure diagram of ensemble model. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  5. 17485

    Fitting formula parameter table. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  6. 17486

    Test plan. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  7. 17487

    Fitting surface parameters. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  8. 17488

    Model generalisation validation error analysis. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  9. 17489

    Empirical model prediction error analysis. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  10. 17490

    Fitting curve parameters. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  11. 17491

    Test instrument. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  12. 17492

    Empirical model establishment process. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  13. 17493

    Model prediction error trend chart. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  14. 17494

    Basic physical parameters of red clay. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  15. 17495

    BP neural network structure diagram. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  16. 17496

    Structure diagram of GBDT model. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  17. 17497

    Model prediction error analysis index. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  18. 17498

    Fitting curve parameter table. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  19. 17499

    Model prediction error analysis. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  20. 17500

    Synthesis, Structure, and Dynamic Behavior of Cyclopentadienyl-Lithium, -Sodium, and -Potassium Annelated with Bicyclo[2.2.2]octene Units:  A Systematic Study on Site Exchange of A... by Tohru Nishinaga (1630696)

    Published 2003
    “…Within this range, a tendency was observed for the Δ<i>G</i><sup>⧧</sup> values to increase as the size of the metal decreased. Theoretical calculations (B3LYP/6-31G(d)) afforded considerably large values as the gas-phase dissociation energy for <b>1</b>−M (162.7 kcal mol<sup>-1</sup> for M = Li; 131.6 kcal mol<sup>-1</sup> for M = Na; 110.9 kcal mol<sup>-1</sup> for M = K) and for <b>2</b>−M (170.0 kcal mol<sup>-1</sup> for M = Li; 137.5 kcal mol<sup>-1</sup> for M = Na; 115.4 kcal mol<sup>-1</sup> for M = K). …”