Search alternatives:
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
581
-
582
-
583
-
584
-
585
-
586
Decrease in log<sub>10</sub> CFU counts in footpads.
Published 2013“…<p>Decrease in the log<sub>10</sub> CFU counts in the footpads of mice treated with, streptomycin+ rifampin for 5 days a week (STR+RIF 5/7), STR+RIF for 7 days a week (STR+RIF 7/7) and STR+ rifapentine (RPT) (STR+RPT 5/7) compared to untreated controls. …”
-
587
-
588
-
589
-
590
-
591
-
592
-
593
-
594
-
595
-
596
-
597
CPGF NPs decrease the growth kinetics of breast cancer cells.
Published 2014“…<p>(<b>A</b>) The NPs decreased the number of cells in MDAMB231 and MCF7, indicated by cell growth assay. …”
-
598
-
599
GSH, but not GSSG, specifically decreases ABCB10 ATP binding activity.
Published 2015“…<p>A representative autoradiography image and the quantification shown in the bar graph demonstrate that GSH decreased [α-<sup>32</sup>P] 8-azido-ATP signal in ABCB10 from SMPs in a dose dependent manner, whereas GSSG did not. …”
-
600
Heterozygous and homozygous loss of TCF4 leads to dendritic spine density decrease in the adult brain.
Published 2018“…Scale bar, 10 μm. (D) After tamoxifen administration <i>Tcf4</i><sup><i>fl/+</i></sup> and <i>Tcf4</i><sup><i>fl/fl</i></sup> display decreased spine density in the cortex (left) and in stratum oriens of CA1 (middle) compared to WT; n = 6 mice; ** p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. …”