Showing 146,761 - 146,780 results of 227,895 for search '(( 5 ((wt decrease) OR (nn decrease)) ) OR ( 10 ((we decrease) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 2.10s Refine Results
  1. 146761
  2. 146762
  3. 146763
  4. 146764
  5. 146765
  6. 146766
  7. 146767
  8. 146768
  9. 146769
  10. 146770
  11. 146771

    Table_1_FRAGTE2: An Enhanced Algorithm to Pre-Select Closely Related Genomes for Bacterial Species Demarcation.XLS by Jiaqi Zeng (5987465)

    Published 2022
    “…However, the overall amount of pairs sieved by FRAGTE1 is still large, requiring seriously unaffordable computing cost, especially for large datasets. Here, we present FRAGTE2. Tests on simulated genomes, real genomes, and metagenome-assembled genomes revealed that (i) FRAGTE2 outstandingly reduces ~50–60.10% of the overall amount of pairs sieved by FRAGTE1, dramatically decreasing the computing cost required for whole-genome species demarcation afterward; (ii) FRAGTE2 shows superior sensitivity than FRAGTE1; (iii) FRAGTE2 shows higher specificity than FRAGTE1; and (iv) FRAGTE2 is faster than or comparable with FRAGTE1. …”
  12. 146772

    Data_Sheet_1_FRAGTE2: An Enhanced Algorithm to Pre-Select Closely Related Genomes for Bacterial Species Demarcation.PDF by Jiaqi Zeng (5987465)

    Published 2022
    “…However, the overall amount of pairs sieved by FRAGTE1 is still large, requiring seriously unaffordable computing cost, especially for large datasets. Here, we present FRAGTE2. Tests on simulated genomes, real genomes, and metagenome-assembled genomes revealed that (i) FRAGTE2 outstandingly reduces ~50–60.10% of the overall amount of pairs sieved by FRAGTE1, dramatically decreasing the computing cost required for whole-genome species demarcation afterward; (ii) FRAGTE2 shows superior sensitivity than FRAGTE1; (iii) FRAGTE2 shows higher specificity than FRAGTE1; and (iv) FRAGTE2 is faster than or comparable with FRAGTE1. …”
  13. 146773
  14. 146774
  15. 146775
  16. 146776
  17. 146777
  18. 146778
  19. 146779
  20. 146780