Search alternatives:
wt decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
wt decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
30841
The effect of the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 (LY) on the cell viability and the [Ca<sup>2+</sup>]<sub>i</sub> of primary cultured SD rat retinal cells in H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> in...
Published 2013“…<p>A: Western blot results of the activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway after βE2 treatment for 0.5 hrs; B: Quantitative data of A; C, E, G, and I: Cell viability quantitative data; D, F, H, and J: [Ca<sup>2+</sup>]<sub>i</sub> quantitative data; C and D: The effects of LY treatments for 24 hrs and 0.5 hrs on the cell viability and the resting [Ca<sup>2+</sup>]<sub>i</sub>; E and F: The inhibitory effect of LY pretreatment for 0.5 hrs on the increased cell viability and [Ca<sup>2+</sup>]<sub>i</sub> induced by 10 μM βE2 treatment for 0.5 hrs (10 μM LY in E, 10 μM and 20 μM LY in F); G and H: The effect of LY pretreatment for 0.5 hrs on the decreased cell viability and increased [Ca<sup>2+</sup>]<sub>i</sub> induced by 100 μM H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> treatment for 2 hrs (10 μM LY in G, 10 μM and 20 μM LY in H); I and J: The dose-dependent attenuating impact of 20-50 μM LY pretreatment for 0.5 hrs on the βE2 retinal protective role against H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> injury, which is associated with the dose-dependent attenuation of the increased [Ca<sup>2+</sup>]<sub>i</sub> (Protocol of drug application: LY for 0.5 hrs, E2 for 0.5 hrs and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> for 2 hrs). …”
-
30842
Image_1_T-Lymphocyte Subsets Alteration, Infection and Renal Outcome in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.TIF
Published 2021“…The primary outcomes were the major infection and renal outcome.</p><p>Results: A total of 410 CKD patients were enrolled; the average age was 47.25 years. …”
-
30843
Data_Sheet_1_T-Lymphocyte Subsets Alteration, Infection and Renal Outcome in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.docx
Published 2021“…The primary outcomes were the major infection and renal outcome.</p><p>Results: A total of 410 CKD patients were enrolled; the average age was 47.25 years. …”
-
30844
Image_2_T-Lymphocyte Subsets Alteration, Infection and Renal Outcome in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.TIFF
Published 2021“…The primary outcomes were the major infection and renal outcome.</p><p>Results: A total of 410 CKD patients were enrolled; the average age was 47.25 years. …”
-
30845
Northern blot analysis of riRNA.
Published 2016“…The level of rRNA markedly decreased in the stationary phase. [C] <i>E</i>. <i>coli</i> BW25113 was grown in M9-glucose medium, and in the middle of exponential phase, total RNA was prepared using Isogen and subjected to Northern blot analysis using a series of Northern probes (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0163057#pone.0163057.t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a>, probes N01 to N10). riRNA was detected using two specific probes, probe-N3 and probe-N4 (for probes see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0163057#pone.0163057.t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a>; and for primers used for amplification of these probes, see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0163057#pone.0163057.s005" target="_blank">S2 Table</a>). …”
-
30846
Supplemental Material for Juurakko et al., 2021
Published 2021“…</p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p>A list of protein accession identifications for all significantly increased and decreased proteins obtained by MS were assembled and used as inputs for STRING (version 11.0) to predict protein-protein interactions (Franceschini <i>et al.…”
-
30847
Table_8_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.XLSX
Published 2024“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
-
30848
Table_1_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX
Published 2024“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
-
30849
Table_6_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX
Published 2024“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
-
30850
Table_10_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX
Published 2024“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
-
30851
Table_2_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.XLSX
Published 2024“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
-
30852
Attention reduces decision uncertainty under high cognitive demand.
Published 2025“…Yellow: increased, dark grey: decreased, light grey: unchanged. (M) Bar plots show the percentage of glomeruli exhibiting a change in response for cued vs. un-cued trials. …”
-
30853
Table_7_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX
Published 2024“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
-
30854
Table_13_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX
Published 2024“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
-
30855
Table_12_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX
Published 2024“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
-
30856
Living 3,4-Polymerization of Isoprene by Cationic Rare Earth Metal Alkyl Complexes Bearing Iminoamido Ligands
Published 2011“…The sterically crowded complexes <b>1</b>−<b>3</b> give a mixture of 3,4- and <i>trans</i>-1,4-polyisoprenes (3,4-selectivities: 48−82%, <i>trans</i>-1,4-selectivities: 50−17%), whereas the less sterically demanding complexes <b>4</b>−<b>6</b> show high 3,4-selectivities (3,4-selectivities: 90−100%). …”
-
30857
Table_14_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.XLSX
Published 2024“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
-
30858
Table_3_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.XLSX
Published 2024“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
-
30859
Table_11_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX
Published 2024“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
-
30860
Table_15_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.XLSX
Published 2024“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”