Search alternatives:
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
281
-
282
-
283
-
284
Skin-resident macrophages decrease in number before the onset of anagen.
Published 2014“…Note the decrease in F4/80<sup>+</sup> at A<sub>VI</sub>. Each histogram point represents the mean value of positive cells per 10× magnification field at 30 µm distance from HF <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002002#pbio.1002002-Paus1" target="_blank">[15]</a>. 10 fields/section/mouse were analyzed; <i>n</i> = 4. …”
-
285
-
286
Decrease in optical density of <i>gerP</i> mutants in L-alanine and inosine.
Published 2013“…a<p>Spores were incubated in 0.5 mM L-alanine and 1 mM inosine. ∼65% decrease in OD<sub>600</sub> represents ∼100% germination. …”
-
287
Average mean decrease Gini across 100 partitions for the top 10 most important variables for binary mixed model and random forest.
Published 2025“…<p>Average mean decrease Gini across 100 partitions for the top 10 most important variables for binary mixed model and random forest.…”
-
288
-
289
-
290
-
291
-
292
-
293
-
294
-
295
-
296
-
297
-
298
-
299
Riccardin D decreased proliferation and induced apoptosis in intestinal polyps.
Published 2013“…Quantitative data for proliferation and apoptosis were determined as number of PCNA-positive, TUNEL-positive cells×100/total number of cells, respectively. The bars represent mean ± S.D. of six animals. *, p<0.001 <i>versus</i> control. …”
-
300
Viability of microencapsulated FP ICCs decreased with time post-transplantation.
Published 2013“…B) Viability decreased with time post-transplantation. Values are mean ± SEM (n = 100 microcapsules/mice for each time point); *p<0.05 viability for days 7 to 21 when compared to pre-transplantation control and days 1 and 3 post-transplantation; #p<0.05 viability for days 14 and 21 when compared to day 7 post-transplantation (one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey-Kramer Multiple-Comparison test).…”