Search alternatives:
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
2561
-
2562
-
2563
Decreased GH storage and secretion in PICK1-deficient mice.
Published 2013“…(C) Decreased relative expression level of IGF-1 mRNA in the liver of PICK1-deficient mice versus WT mice (**<i>p</i> = 0.0045). …”
-
2564
-
2565
-
2566
-
2567
-
2568
Mean mitochondrial DNA content in response to benzo<i>(a)</i>pyrene.
Published 2013“…<p>Mean mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content of human TK6 cells exposed to 0; 0.05; 0.5; 5; 50 and 500 µM benzo<i>(a)</i>pyrene (BAP). …”
-
2569
Paeameter ranges and optimal values.
Published 2025“…Firstly, recursive feature elimination using cross validation (RFECV), maximum information coefficient (MIC), and mean decrease accuracy (MDA) methods were utilized to select population distribution feature factors. …”
-
2570
Improved random forest algorithm.
Published 2025“…Firstly, recursive feature elimination using cross validation (RFECV), maximum information coefficient (MIC), and mean decrease accuracy (MDA) methods were utilized to select population distribution feature factors. …”
-
2571
Datasets used in the study area.
Published 2025“…Firstly, recursive feature elimination using cross validation (RFECV), maximum information coefficient (MIC), and mean decrease accuracy (MDA) methods were utilized to select population distribution feature factors. …”
-
2572
Evaluation of the improved random forest model.
Published 2025“…Firstly, recursive feature elimination using cross validation (RFECV), maximum information coefficient (MIC), and mean decrease accuracy (MDA) methods were utilized to select population distribution feature factors. …”
-
2573
Comparison of model metrics.
Published 2025“…Firstly, recursive feature elimination using cross validation (RFECV), maximum information coefficient (MIC), and mean decrease accuracy (MDA) methods were utilized to select population distribution feature factors. …”
-
2574
Flowchart of population spatialization.
Published 2025“…Firstly, recursive feature elimination using cross validation (RFECV), maximum information coefficient (MIC), and mean decrease accuracy (MDA) methods were utilized to select population distribution feature factors. …”
-
2575
-
2576
-
2577
Patterns of lifetime use of substances by gender.
Published 2023“…The lifetime prevalence of substance use was 41.5%, while that of alcohol use was 36%. For both, a higher mean neuroticism score [substance use- (AOR 1.05, 95%CI; 1, 1.10: p = 0.013); alcohol use- (AOR 1.04, 95%CI; 0.99, 1.09: p = 0.032)] showed increased odds of lifetime use, while a higher mean agreeableness score [substance use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.008); alcohol use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.032)] showed decreased odds of lifetime use. …”
-
2578
S1 Data -
Published 2023“…The lifetime prevalence of substance use was 41.5%, while that of alcohol use was 36%. For both, a higher mean neuroticism score [substance use- (AOR 1.05, 95%CI; 1, 1.10: p = 0.013); alcohol use- (AOR 1.04, 95%CI; 0.99, 1.09: p = 0.032)] showed increased odds of lifetime use, while a higher mean agreeableness score [substance use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.008); alcohol use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.032)] showed decreased odds of lifetime use. …”
-
2579
Factors associated with substance use.
Published 2023“…The lifetime prevalence of substance use was 41.5%, while that of alcohol use was 36%. For both, a higher mean neuroticism score [substance use- (AOR 1.05, 95%CI; 1, 1.10: p = 0.013); alcohol use- (AOR 1.04, 95%CI; 0.99, 1.09: p = 0.032)] showed increased odds of lifetime use, while a higher mean agreeableness score [substance use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.008); alcohol use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.032)] showed decreased odds of lifetime use. …”
-
2580
Factors associated with personality traits.
Published 2023“…The lifetime prevalence of substance use was 41.5%, while that of alcohol use was 36%. For both, a higher mean neuroticism score [substance use- (AOR 1.05, 95%CI; 1, 1.10: p = 0.013); alcohol use- (AOR 1.04, 95%CI; 0.99, 1.09: p = 0.032)] showed increased odds of lifetime use, while a higher mean agreeableness score [substance use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.008); alcohol use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.032)] showed decreased odds of lifetime use. …”