Search alternatives:
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
281
-
282
-
283
-
284
-
285
-
286
Baseline sleep/wake characterizations of WT and W/W<sup>v</sup> mice.
Published 2013“…*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, WT versus W/W<sup>v</sup>. All data is expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 8/group).…”
-
287
-
288
-
289
-
290
-
291
-
292
-
293
-
294
-
295
-
296
-
297
-
298
-
299
Regions (α-helices, β-sheets, and loops) showing an average increase or decrease of RMSF in the MTs compared to the WT; RMSF of a particular structure is taken to be increased or decreased if there is an average change in RMSF of >0.03 nm in at least ≥50% of its residues.
Published 2014“…<p>Regions (α-helices, β-sheets, and loops) showing an average increase or decrease of RMSF in the MTs compared to the WT; RMSF of a particular structure is taken to be increased or decreased if there is an average change in RMSF of >0.03 nm in at least ≥50% of its residues.…”
-
300