Search alternatives:
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
e non » _ non (Expand Search), a non (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
e non » _ non (Expand Search), a non (Expand Search)
-
241
-
242
-
243
The ratio between the bias in the naïve SI and shuffle SI decreases with tuning specificity, but not with sample size.
Published 2022“…Data pooled from N = 9 simulations, each corresponding to behavioral data from a different mouse. (B) The bias ratio (mean ± SEM) decreases as a function of the true SI for a sample size of 1 minute (blue), 5 minutes (cyan) and 20 minutes (green). …”
-
244
-
245
-
246
The raw data for Fig 5B.
Published 2025“…This study applied the new method to <i>Sox10</i>, uncovering two OL enhancers for it (termed Sox10-E1 and Sox10-E2). Epigenome editing analysis revealed that Sox10-E1 and Sox10-E2 regulate <i>Sox10</i> expression non-redundantly. …”
-
247
-
248
-
249
-
250
-
251
-
252
-
253
-
254
-
255
-
256
-
257
-
258
-
259
-
260