Showing 1,481 - 1,500 results of 101,164 for search '(( 5 a decrease ) OR ( 5 ((((step decrease) OR (teer decrease))) OR (mean decrease)) ))', query time: 1.49s Refine Results
  1. 1481
  2. 1482
  3. 1483
  4. 1484

    <i>Ext1</i> mutant lungs exhibit a decrease in SHH-FGF10 signaling. by Hua He (120374)

    Published 2017
    “…<p>(A) qPCR analysis of key components of FGF signaling pathway in lungs from E14.5. …”
  5. 1485

    Theoretical Study on Reaction Scheme of Silver(I) Containing 5-Substituted Uracils Bridge Formation by Toru Matsui (1313913)

    Published 2011
    “…With a new p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> computing scheme proposed in our previous studies, it is found that a silver coordination decreases the p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> of <b>N</b> by 2.5–3.0 p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> units, which is an important clue for silver-ion selectivity by <b>N</b>. …”
  6. 1486
  7. 1487
  8. 1488
  9. 1489
  10. 1490
  11. 1491
  12. 1492
  13. 1493

    Nilotinib decreases HEI-193 cell viability in a time-, dose-, and growth condition- dependent manner. by Nesrin Sabha (127278)

    Published 2013
    “…(B) HEI-193 grown in PDGF media were treated with 0, 3, 5, 10 or 20 µM nilotinib up to 5 days. Trypan blue viability assay shows decreased number of viable cells at 5 days in 3 µM nilotinib, compared to vehicle shown, mean and SD of six technical replicates. …”
  14. 1494

    Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation of Peptide/Oligonucleotide Complexes in Crowded Macromolecular Media by Qingwen Bai (5221280)

    Published 2020
    “…Our study provides a further step toward a deeper understanding of the kinetics of MLOs in crowded living cells.…”
  15. 1495

    Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation of Peptide/Oligonucleotide Complexes in Crowded Macromolecular Media by Qingwen Bai (5221280)

    Published 2020
    “…Our study provides a further step toward a deeper understanding of the kinetics of MLOs in crowded living cells.…”
  16. 1496

    Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation of Peptide/Oligonucleotide Complexes in Crowded Macromolecular Media by Qingwen Bai (5221280)

    Published 2020
    “…Our study provides a further step toward a deeper understanding of the kinetics of MLOs in crowded living cells.…”
  17. 1497

    List of Included studies. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  18. 1498

    The search strategy in three databases. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  19. 1499

    NIH score. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  20. 1500

    List of excluded studies. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”