Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
cm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), c decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 cm » 5 mm (Expand Search), 5 c (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
cm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), c decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 cm » 5 mm (Expand Search), 5 c (Expand Search)
-
101
-
102
-
103
-
104
-
105
-
106
-
107
-
108
A decrease in the invasiveness of <i>Candida albicans</i> into Caco-2 cells parallels the differentiation of intestinal epithelial cells.
Published 2016“…Caco-2 cell differentiation increased throughout the culture as highlighted by the increase in TEER measurements (Ω.cm<sup>2</sup>) (full line), which correlated with a decrease in <i>C</i>. …”
-
109
-
110
-
111
-
112
-
113
-
114
-
115
-
116
-
117
mGluR5 receptor decreased glycinergic currents.
Published 2019“…<p>(<b>A–B</b>) Bath perfusion of DHPG for 3 min reduced GlyR-IPSCs (<b>A</b>; 70.2 ± 4.2% of baseline at 15–20 min post-DHPG, <i>t</i>[16] = 6.707, <i>p</i> < 0.001, paired Student <i>t</i> test), but not GABA<sub>A</sub>-receptor–mediated IPSCs (<b>B</b>; 102.9 ± 3.3% of baseline at 15–20 min post-DHPG, <i>t</i>[5] = 0.347, <i>p</i> = 0.743) in spinal slices of mice. …”
-
118
Light-emitting diode generated red light (LED-RL) at a fluence of 480 J/cm<sup>2</sup> significantly decreased relative fibroblast migration speed to 83.0±5.6% (p = 0.0393) compared to matched controls (100±5.8%).
Published 2015“…Light-emitting diode generated red light (LED-RL) at a fluence of 640 J/cm<sup>2</sup> significantly decreased relative fibroblast migration speed to 74.4±5.5% (p = 0.0003) compared to matched controls (100±4.2%). …”
-
119
-
120