Search alternatives:
cm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), c decreased (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 cm » 5 mm (Expand Search), 5 c (Expand Search)
cm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), c decreased (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 cm » 5 mm (Expand Search), 5 c (Expand Search)
-
38981
-
38982
-
38983
-
38984
-
38985
-
38986
Schematic diagram showing Nrf2 induction and consequences during <i>de novo</i> KSHV infection of endothelial cells.
Published 2014“…As latency initiates, vFLIP expression further fuels the COX-2/PGE2 axis, and likely other pathways, to augment Nrf2 activity. …”
-
38987
Northern blot analysis of riRNA.
Published 2016“…The level of rRNA markedly decreased in the stationary phase. [C] <i>E</i>. <i>coli</i> BW25113 was grown in M9-glucose medium, and in the middle of exponential phase, total RNA was prepared using Isogen and subjected to Northern blot analysis using a series of Northern probes (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0163057#pone.0163057.t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a>, probes N01 to N10). riRNA was detected using two specific probes, probe-N3 and probe-N4 (for probes see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0163057#pone.0163057.t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a>; and for primers used for amplification of these probes, see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0163057#pone.0163057.s005" target="_blank">S2 Table</a>). …”
-
38988
The system under study.
Published 2025“…In TS3, the SFS-optimized HBF decreases <i>THD</i><sub><i>V</i></sub> by 45.71%, <i>TDD</i><sub><i>I</i></sub> by 99.96%, and <i>P</i><sub><i>LOSS</i></sub> by 33.26% compared to the uncompensated case. …”
-
38989
TS2 parameters.
Published 2025“…In TS3, the SFS-optimized HBF decreases <i>THD</i><sub><i>V</i></sub> by 45.71%, <i>TDD</i><sub><i>I</i></sub> by 99.96%, and <i>P</i><sub><i>LOSS</i></sub> by 33.26% compared to the uncompensated case. …”
-
38990
TS1 parameters.
Published 2025“…In TS3, the SFS-optimized HBF decreases <i>THD</i><sub><i>V</i></sub> by 45.71%, <i>TDD</i><sub><i>I</i></sub> by 99.96%, and <i>P</i><sub><i>LOSS</i></sub> by 33.26% compared to the uncompensated case. …”
-
38991
TS3 parameters.
Published 2025“…In TS3, the SFS-optimized HBF decreases <i>THD</i><sub><i>V</i></sub> by 45.71%, <i>TDD</i><sub><i>I</i></sub> by 99.96%, and <i>P</i><sub><i>LOSS</i></sub> by 33.26% compared to the uncompensated case. …”
-
38992
-
38993
Image_1_Oat polar lipids and sunflower lecithin similarly improve cardiometabolic risk markers and appetite controlling hormone responses after breakfast and a subsequent lunch. A...
Published 2024“…The meals were served as breakfast followed by a standardised lunch (white wheat bread and meat balls) after 3.5 h. …”
-
38994
HBF design results minimize <i>P</i><sub><i>LOSS</i></sub> in TS2.
Published 2025“…In TS3, the SFS-optimized HBF decreases <i>THD</i><sub><i>V</i></sub> by 45.71%, <i>TDD</i><sub><i>I</i></sub> by 99.96%, and <i>P</i><sub><i>LOSS</i></sub> by 33.26% compared to the uncompensated case. …”
-
38995
HBF design results to minimize <i>P<sub>LOSS</sub></i> in TS1.
Published 2025“…In TS3, the SFS-optimized HBF decreases <i>THD</i><sub><i>V</i></sub> by 45.71%, <i>TDD</i><sub><i>I</i></sub> by 99.96%, and <i>P</i><sub><i>LOSS</i></sub> by 33.26% compared to the uncompensated case. …”
-
38996
HBF design parameters for TS3.
Published 2025“…In TS3, the SFS-optimized HBF decreases <i>THD</i><sub><i>V</i></sub> by 45.71%, <i>TDD</i><sub><i>I</i></sub> by 99.96%, and <i>P</i><sub><i>LOSS</i></sub> by 33.26% compared to the uncompensated case. …”
-
38997
HBF design parameters for TS1.
Published 2025“…In TS3, the SFS-optimized HBF decreases <i>THD</i><sub><i>V</i></sub> by 45.71%, <i>TDD</i><sub><i>I</i></sub> by 99.96%, and <i>P</i><sub><i>LOSS</i></sub> by 33.26% compared to the uncompensated case. …”
-
38998
HBF design parameters for TS2.
Published 2025“…In TS3, the SFS-optimized HBF decreases <i>THD</i><sub><i>V</i></sub> by 45.71%, <i>TDD</i><sub><i>I</i></sub> by 99.96%, and <i>P</i><sub><i>LOSS</i></sub> by 33.26% compared to the uncompensated case. …”
-
38999
HBF design results minimize P<sub>LOSS</sub> in TS3.
Published 2025“…In TS3, the SFS-optimized HBF decreases <i>THD</i><sub><i>V</i></sub> by 45.71%, <i>TDD</i><sub><i>I</i></sub> by 99.96%, and <i>P</i><sub><i>LOSS</i></sub> by 33.26% compared to the uncompensated case. …”
-
39000