Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 fold » _ fold (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 fold » _ fold (Expand Search)
-
901
-
902
-
903
-
904
-
905
-
906
-
907
-
908
-
909
-
910
-
911
Blocking of MC1R, MC2R or MC5R causes a decrease in the enucleation ratio of erythrocytes.
Published 2015“…The enucleation ratio was decreased in the erythroblasts treated with anti-MC1R nAb, anti-MC2R nAb or anti-MC5R nAb. *, <i>P <</i> 0.0001, each point versus control. n = 3; error bars, s.e.m. …”
-
912
-
913
-
914
At E9.5 Actb<sup>−/−</sup> neural crest cells show a significant decrease of cadherin-11 expression.
Published 2014“…<p>(A) Quantification of N-cadherin intensities in Actb<sup>+/+</sup> and Actb<sup>−/−</sup> migratory cells adjacent to the neural tube at E8.5 and E9.5 (left graph, Y-axis: relative intensities) and colocalization of N-cadherin with p75 in migratory cells at E8.5 and E9.5 (right graph, Y-axis: colocalization index on a scale from 0 to 1). …”
-
915
-
916
-
917
-
918
Experiment 1: Comparison of effort and delay discounting.
Published 2015“…The sigmoidal model was included because it fulfills two particular features: it can obtain initially concave shapes, in line with work showing that the sense of effort increases as a power function of the target force with decreasing sensitivity at lower effort levels; and it entails a turning point after which effort discounting becomes progressively less steep. …”
-
919
-
920
<i>Cdkl5</i> -/Y mice show an increased freezing time and a decreased distance traveled during the pretone period in the altered context.
Published 2018“…<i>Cdkl5</i> -/Y mice show a significantly decreased distance traveled in response to the first footshock (p = 0.0158) compared with control mice. …”