Showing 181 - 200 results of 37,892 for search '(( 5 ht decrease ) OR ((( 50 ((ns decrease) OR (a decrease)) ) OR ( 2 e decrease ))))', query time: 0.85s Refine Results
  1. 181
  2. 182
  3. 183

    Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Peripheral 5HT<sub>2B</sub> Antagonists for Liver Fibrosis by Jihyeon Yoon (8705706)

    Published 2025
    “…Recent studies have shown that antagonizing 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2B (5HT<sub>2B</sub>) stimulates the apoptosis of activated hepatic stellate cells and inhibits their proliferation while concurrently regressing hepatocyte proliferation. …”
  4. 184

    Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Peripheral 5HT<sub>2B</sub> Antagonists for Liver Fibrosis by Jihyeon Yoon (8705706)

    Published 2025
    “…Recent studies have shown that antagonizing 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2B (5HT<sub>2B</sub>) stimulates the apoptosis of activated hepatic stellate cells and inhibits their proliferation while concurrently regressing hepatocyte proliferation. …”
  5. 185
  6. 186
  7. 187
  8. 188

    20E repressed ILP-mediated cell membrane translocation of HaP60 and HaP110, dephosphorylated HaP60 and HaP110, and decreased their interaction. by Yu-Qin Di (8752317)

    Published 2021
    “…Green, HaP60 or HaP110; red, cell membrane stained with WGA; blue, nuclei stained with DAPI; merge, overlapped green, blue, and red fluorescence. Bar, 50 μm. <b>C.</b> Co-IP assay showed that 20E decreased the HaP60–HaP110 interaction and induced dephosphorylation in cells. …”
  9. 189
  10. 190
  11. 191
  12. 192
  13. 193
  14. 194
  15. 195

    Decreased NO concentrations and impairment of eNOS localization in EHD2 del/del mesenteric arteries. by Claudia Matthaeus (7485782)

    Published 2019
    “…See also <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0223620#pone.0223620.s005" target="_blank">S4 Fig</a>. (E) Plasma membrane eNOS staining was analyzed and revealed decreased eNOS fluorescence intensity in EHD2 del/del mesenteric arteries compared to EHD2 del/+ (n(del/+) = 83/3; n(del/del) = 81/3). …”
  16. 196
  17. 197
  18. 198
  19. 199
  20. 200