Showing 221 - 240 results of 27,974 for search '(( 5 ht decrease ) OR ( 5 ((point decrease) OR (((nn decrease) OR (mean decrease)))) ))', query time: 0.77s Refine Results
  1. 221
  2. 222
  3. 223

    rVλ6Wil fibrils cause a decrease in cardiomyocytes MTT reduction without inducing cell death. by Helen P. McWilliams-Koeppen (116503)

    Published 2015
    “…(C) Cell number, quantified using crystal violet (black) did not decrease over 72 h of incubation with 1 μM rVλ6Wil fibrils despite a decrease in MMT reduction (grey; n = 3 samples per time point). …”
  4. 224
  5. 225
  6. 226

    OCA alone markedly decreases and combined with Gemcitabine or Cisplatin abrogates growth of iCCA xenografts. by S. Di Matteo (6260417)

    Published 2019
    “…After 4 weeks, when the tumor size was approximately 100 mm<sup>3</sup> (T<sub>0</sub>) mice were treated with OCA (0.03% w/w, 30 mg/kg) alone or combined with Cisplatin (2.4 mg/Kg in 100 μl) or Gemcitabine (1.05 mg/Kg in 100 μl) for 5 additional weeks. a) Results are expressed as percent increase in tumor volume at different time points. …”
  7. 227

    Schematic representation of possible intracellular 5-HT signaling pathways in chondrocytes. by Ayaka Hori (4597795)

    Published 2017
    “…Then, the phosphorylated ERK1/2 level is increased through both activation of PKCε and PKCζ; as a result, CCN2 production is decreased. Furthermore, independent of PKC, 5-HT may transmit a certain unknown signal to JNK, which also inhibits the CCN2 production in chondrocytes.…”
  8. 228

    Flow diagram of the study. by Yoonjee Cho (15453454)

    Published 2023
    “…A total of 162 patients were included. The SOFA score on POD 5 was significantly higher in the High-decrease group compared with the Low-decrease group (5.2 ± 2.6 vs. 4.1 ± 2.3; mean difference: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.3 to 1.8; P = 0.005). …”
  9. 229

    Baseline characteristics of patients. by Yoonjee Cho (15453454)

    Published 2023
    “…A total of 162 patients were included. The SOFA score on POD 5 was significantly higher in the High-decrease group compared with the Low-decrease group (5.2 ± 2.6 vs. 4.1 ± 2.3; mean difference: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.3 to 1.8; P = 0.005). …”
  10. 230
  11. 231
  12. 232
  13. 233
  14. 234
  15. 235
  16. 236
  17. 237
  18. 238
  19. 239
  20. 240