Search alternatives:
sizes decrease » size increase (Expand Search), scores decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
2 sizes » _ sizes (Expand Search)
5 mean » _ mean (Expand Search), a mean (Expand Search), i mean (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » size increase (Expand Search), scores decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
2 sizes » _ sizes (Expand Search)
5 mean » _ mean (Expand Search), a mean (Expand Search), i mean (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
The ratio between the bias in the naïve SI and shuffle SI decreases with tuning specificity, but not with sample size.
Published 2022“…Data pooled from N = 9 simulations, each corresponding to behavioral data from a different mouse. (B) The bias ratio (mean ± SEM) decreases as a function of the true SI for a sample size of 1 minute (blue), 5 minutes (cyan) and 20 minutes (green). …”
-
6
-
7
-
8
Alternative bounded and monotonically decreasing functions do not accurately fit the bias in the naïve SI.
Published 2022“…The BAE method more accurately fits the data than an exponential fit (matched-pairs two-sided t-test<sub>(8)</sub>, t = 7.4, p = 7.4·10<sup>−5</sup>) and a power law fit (matched-pairs two-sided t-test<sub>(8)</sub>, t = 5.8, p = 4.1·10<sup>−4</sup>). …”
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20