Search alternatives:
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 mean » _ mean (Expand Search), a mean (Expand Search), i mean (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 mean » _ mean (Expand Search), a mean (Expand Search), i mean (Expand Search)
-
1701
-
1702
-
1703
-
1704
-
1705
-
1706
-
1707
-
1708
-
1709
-
1710
-
1711
<i>Ext1</i> mutant lungs exhibit a decrease in SHH-FGF10 signaling.
Published 2017“…<p>(A) qPCR analysis of key components of FGF signaling pathway in lungs from E14.5. …”
-
1712
-
1713
-
1714
-
1715
-
1716
-
1717
-
1718
Nilotinib decreases HEI-193 cell viability in a time-, dose-, and growth condition- dependent manner.
Published 2013“…(B) HEI-193 grown in PDGF media were treated with 0, 3, 5, 10 or 20 µM nilotinib up to 5 days. Trypan blue viability assay shows decreased number of viable cells at 5 days in 3 µM nilotinib, compared to vehicle shown, mean and SD of six technical replicates. …”
-
1719
List of Included studies.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
1720
The search strategy in three databases.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”