Search alternatives:
mm decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
5 mm » 1 mm (Expand Search)
mm decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
5 mm » 1 mm (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Predictive values of IC<sub>50</sub> in mM (FFAs) for vanadium compounds and <i>in vivo</i> observations IC<sub>50</sub> in mM (FFAs) and decreasing blood glucose level.
Published 2014“…<p>Predictive values of IC<sub>50</sub> in mM (FFAs) for vanadium compounds and <i>in vivo</i> observations IC<sub>50</sub> in mM (FFAs) and decreasing blood glucose level.…”
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Olaparib reverses the oxLDL-mediated decrease in co-immunoprecipitation of IκBα with RelA or p50.
Published 2024“…Relative band densities from three independent experiments were analyzed. (A) OxLDL decreased co-immunoprecipitation of IκBα with both RelA and p50, and olaparib reversed the effect of oxLDL on the dissociation of IκBα with RelA and p50. …”
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
mGluR5 receptor decreased glycinergic currents.
Published 2019“…(<b>E</b>) The inhibitory effect of CHPG on GlyR-IPSCs was not blocked by intracellularly loaded GDP-β-S (62.3 ± 6.4% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[6] = 2.782, <i>p</i> = 0.032), chelerythrine (60.9 ± 11.3% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[6] = 2.705, <i>p</i> = 0.035), or Ro-32-0432 (69.9 ± 3.2% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[5] = 8.495, <i>p</i> < 0.001). (<b>F</b>) Postsynaptic loading of U-0126 or PD98059 prevented CHPG from decreasing glycinergic responses (U-0126, 107.6 ± 10.4% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[8] = 0.997, <i>p</i> = 0.348; PD98059, 93.1 ± 5.0% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[5] = 0.883, <i>p</i> = 0.418). …”
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
Topography of the relationship between the change in alpha power decrease and the change in M50 gating ratio.
Published 2013“…B: Relationship between change in alpha power decrease (abscissa, negative values indicate improvement) and pre-to-post-training change in M50 gating ratio (ordinate, positive values indicate changes towards normal, that is, smaller gating ratio) by patient training group based on the ROI in 4A.…”